0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.
@DBIt will be recharged. He was in illegal possesion. The Wisconsin state law and Illinois state law both say so. Thete was absolutely no way for Rittenhouse to legally obtain and possess any firearm. He was a 17yo Illinois resident that had someone else by the firearm for him. Yes the judge is an idiot that doesn't know his own laws. The judge is also partisan on this case. The prosecution is one of the biggest idiots out there l. From the beginning of the case he has overcharged from the beginning. Rittenhouse should be prosecuted by the DOJ for violating federal firearms laws as well as Wisconsin state firearms laws.
If I were sitting on the jury right now, I'd be looking around for a cyanide capsule ....
https://mobile.twitter.com/LawSelfDefense/status/1460296575926693893
Miranda Devine@mirandadevineBinger is uptight because he thought he’d fixed it so the jury will find Rittenhouse guilty of lesser charges when they should acquit him on everything once they find he acted in self defense.
YouTube is busy messing with independent coverage of the Rittenhouse trial, taking down live streams from Rekieta Law and others, then allowing them back up. Clearly YouTube feels that only the official narrative should be allowed.
In other words, all sorts of manic hand-waving and lying to distract from the essential core issue: self-defense in the face of lethal aggression by the people whom he shot.
Yes, they are. They're not effing with OB ... link posted above.
Sure, they won't mess with the alphabet media. But independent streamers with their own commentary, who draw more viewers than the alphabet media, are clearly seen as a threat by YouTube.
How does the statute apply to him? The prosecution agreed that the rifle he carried was not a "short-barreled rifle" and therefore he was not in violation of Wisc. Stat. 941.28, as a matter of the law of the case. As such, Wisc. Stat. 948.60, by its own terms, does not apply to him.
There is no way possible for a 17yo Illinois resident to be in legal possession of any firearm in Wisconsin. The statute quoted apply to residents of Wisconsin. Also the statute that covers open carry was also violated. Rittenhousewas in illegal possesion of a firearm because he was an Illinois resident and he was 17yo. Can anyone answer the question of how did Rittenhouse legally get possession of the firearm he was carrying?
@DB How did Rittenhouse legally get the firearm he had?
There is no way possible for a 17yo Illinois resident to be in legal possession of any firearm in Wisconsin. The statute quoted apply to residents of Wisconsin. Also the statute that covers open carry was also violated. Rittenhousewas in illegal possesion of a firearm because he was an Illinois resident and he was 17yo. Can anyone answer the question of how did Rittenhouse legally get possession of the firearm he was carrying?@DB How did Rittenhouse legally get the firearm he had?
Do explain. With citation to statutes, careful quotation of actual statutory language, and case law, if applicable. Your bald-faced assertions fly in the face of the Wisconsin statutory language itself.
