A new crisis for climate science?

[rangerrebew]

A new crisis for climate science?

    Date: 03/08/21
    Steven Hayward, Power Line

Last week Science published a remarkable article — remarkable for implicitly ratifying what climate “skeptics” have been saying about climate models for at least a decade, namely, that they are running “too hot.”

We are just weeks away from the two major climatista jamborees of 2021. The first is the UN COP 26 meeting in Glasgow next month, which the usual people (John Kerry, etc) are calling “the last chance to save the planet,” because all of the previous 25 “last chance” meetings were a false alarm. (You think I exaggerate? Check out the New York Times from June 30: “Democrats Have a Year to Save the Planet.”)

The second is the release of the next comprehensive report of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which typically issues a new 5,000-page report every five to seven years that collects and summarizes the latest state of “the science” of climate change. Suffice it to say that not much has changed since the first IPCC report almost 30 years ago. There might be some small, subtle changes in the next report, however.

https://www.thegwpf.com/a-new-crisis-for-climate-science/

[Fishrrman]

Climate "science":
One wild postulation, followed by...
...another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one,
...and another one...

(you get the picture...)