I find it interesting (to say the least) that the white creep's face was broadcast nationally almost instantly by the media.
There have been a number of multiple murders committed in the last months by black Americans that have received little coverage. A black person in Indianapolis murdered four people the other week. Two months before that a black person murdered five people in Indianapolis.
Their faces were not instantly broadcast cross country.
There has been a committed effort by the media in the last 10-20 years to try to minimize violent black crime.
90% of the assaults of Asian-Americans in the recent years have been committed by blacks. Most of it has been covered up by the media who many times refuses to describe the race of attackers....unless they're white.
As a general rule, if the media refuses to name the suspect or, if the name is some vanilla name like Michael Brown and they don't identify it's race, then it's pretty safe to conclude the attacker is black.
Often they cover up if the attacker is muslim or "homeless" (note on Media-speak: Homeless NEVER commit crime, "transients" do), and they have to be taken to the dentist before they will tell anyone if an attacker is an illegal alien.
But...if the attacker is a white guy, he's all over the news, like that guy named Zimmerman. Then he turned out to be a "white hispanic", though Time or Newsweek had to do some creative editing to give the brown-skinned guy the proper pallor to fit the narrative.
I hate the media. There's absolutely nothing good that can be said about them any more.
