0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,426741.msg2372710.html#msg2372710
This one was filed in court before the election and the evidence was accepted and approved by the court.Unfortunately, it came months after the election.As the Texas suit, it proves we cannot rely upon the courts for sorting out election fraud and illegalities.Virginia Proposed a Rule Change Allowing Late Ballots with No Postmarks. Here's what a Judge Had to Say.It’s not going to overturn the results of the 2020 election, but a judge has ruled that the Virginia Board of Elections broke the law during the 2020 cycle. The board had permitted ballots without postmarks that arrived three days after Election Day to be counted through a proposed rule change last summer. The legal challenge was filed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation, who called the decision a big win for the rule of law (via Daily Caller):The Virginia Board of Elections rule allowing officials to count ballots that arrived without a postmark up to three days after the election was illegal, a state judge ruled.Virginia Circuit Court Judge William Eldridge ruled the state’s late mail-in ballot law violated state statute and permanently banned the law in future Virginia elections, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) announced Monday. PILF sued the state’s board of elections in October on behalf of Thomas Reed, a Frederick County, Virginia election official.The board of elections proposed the rule during an Aug. 4 meeting and related guidance was sent to election officials statewide on Aug. 13 informing them of the change. PILF sued on behalf of Reed on Oct. 9, according to a news release.https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2021/01/27/judge-va-late-postmark-rule-for-ballots-violated-the-law-n2583783
Yeah, a keen sense of the effing obvious .... too damned late.
