Media Announce Biden Plans to Scrap Trump’s Pro-Life Policies

[mystery-ak]

Media Announce Biden Plans to Scrap Trump’s Pro-Life Policies

Dr. Susan Berry 17 Nov 2020

Should Joe Biden become president, one of his first moves will be to scrap President Donald Trump’s extensive pro-life policies, according to the Washington Post and the Associated Press (AP).

The media say the former vice president – who claims to be a Catholic – will first and foremost abide by the wishes of the abortion industry and reverse Trump’s Title X family planning rule that underscored that abortion, i.e., ending the life of an unborn child, is not family planning.

In February 2019, the Trump Department of Health and Human Services released a rule that would block about $60 million in family planning funding to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers who refer girls and women for abortions.

The regulation, which governs Title X, the federal grant program that provides funding for family planning services, prohibited the use of the funds to “perform, promote, refer for, or support abortion as a method of family planning.”

The rule reinstated President Ronald Reagan’s “Protect Life Rule,” which barred the “co-location” of federally funded family planning clinics with abortion clinics.

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/17/media-announce-biden-plans-to-scrap-trumps-pro-life-policies/

[PeteS in CA]

This has been like a partisan see-saw since Reagan.

[Hoodat]

The rule reinstated President Ronald Reagan’s “Protect Life Rule,” which barred the “co-location” of federally funded family planning clinics with abortion clinics.

Yet taxpayer dollars continue to flow to Planned Parenthood clinics that perform abortions.

[dancer]

Of course you will, Creepy Joe.  Satan needs more sacrifices. 

[skeeter]

This will come as a surprise to all those who think there's not a dime's worth of difference between Tump and Biden, and at the cost of Lord knows how many would-be human beings.

[roamer_1]

This will come as a surprise to all those who think there's not a dime's worth of difference between Tump and Biden, and at the cost of Lord knows how many would-be human beings.

No surprise at all... Just like that *snaps fingers* all of it is gone, and right back to what it was.

And then y'all will do the same damn thing again next time.

BETTER to have written LAWS and make it gone forever, or give it back to the states so at least those who care will have a place to go... But no. Go on... Defend the Tump. But sooner or later I hope you get your crayons out and do the real math.

[Hoodat]

This will come as a surprise to all those who think there's not a dime's worth of difference between Tump and Biden, and at the cost of Lord knows how many would-be human beings.

Sure, Trump is the most Pro-Life President this nation has ever had.  And he had the lowest unemployment rate this country has ever had in its history. But I don't like what he tweets.

[skeeter]

No surprise at all... Just like that *snaps fingers* all of it is gone, and right back to what it was.

And then y'all will do the same damn thing again next time.

BETTER to have written LAWS and make it gone forever, or give it back to the states so at least those who care will have a place to go... But no. Go on... Defend the Tump. But sooner or later I hope you get your crayons out and do the real math.

So if it can be reversed its not worth doing.

That makes no sense. Laws can be reversed.

[roamer_1]

So if it can be reversed its not worth doing.

That makes no sense. Laws can be reversed.

Not with a stroke of a pen they can't.
That the next four to eight years will allow abortion to resume is not the Democrats fault. It is our fault, yours and mine... THERE IS NO OPPOSITION TO LIBERALISM. And this proves it.

[skeeter]

Not with a stroke of a pen they can't.
That the next four to eight years will allow abortion to resume is not the Democrats fault. It is our fault, yours and mine... THERE IS NO OPPOSITION TO LIBERALISM. And this proves it.

You condemn Trump for using EOs in lieu of getting policies through an obstinate adversarial congress, even if the policy itself is morally correct and even, as in this case, it saves lives.

IMO you have no credibility where the subject of Trump is concerned.

Go ahead and get your last word. I'm going back to my crayons.

[Hoodat]

BETTER to have written LAWS and make it gone forever, or give it back to the states so at least those who care will have a place to go...

Can't get a law when Dems control the House.  But as for giving it back to the States, this is the closest we have ever been.

Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett

[DB]

No surprise at all... Just like that *snaps fingers* all of it is gone, and right back to what it was.

And then y'all will do the same damn thing again next time.

BETTER to have written LAWS and make it gone forever, or give it back to the states so at least those who care will have a place to go... But no. Go on... Defend the Tump. But sooner or later I hope you get your crayons out and do the real math.

On this particular issue it certainly made a difference to those who weren't aborted while these limits were in affect. The consequences on their lives was most certainly "long term". I'll give Trump credit for doing what he could in spite of the spineless Republicans in congress.

[roamer_1]

You condemn Trump for using EOs in lieu of getting policies through an obstinate adversarial congress, even if the policy itself is morally correct and even, as in this case, it saves lives.

Of course it saves lives. but it is a stop-gap that has repeated every time the Republicans get a president, always the same half measures... and every time, everybody pat each other on the back like its some great thing we've done... And some few years later, it goes right back to what it was. OR WORSE. That is exactly why there has not been a single Conservative win. Not a one. IN THIRTY YEARS. Happy friggin birthday.

IMO you have no credibility where the subject of Trump is concerned.

Suits me fine... My 'I told you sos' will come rolling in like a wildfire now... George Dubya Bush all over again.

[roamer_1]

Can't get a law when Dems control the House.  But as for giving it back to the States, this is the closest we have ever been.

Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett

I don't believe that. Thomas, Alito, and Barrett, perhaps.

[roamer_1]

On this particular issue it certainly made a difference to those who weren't aborted while these limits were in affect. The consequences on their lives was most certainly "long term". I'll give Trump credit for doing what he could in spite of the spineless Republicans in congress.

Sure. But in the mean time, yet again, nothing has changed. Half measures like candy thrown by the clown at the front of the parade. It isn't spineless Republicans. It is Republicans in collusion. And they'll get voted in again. All of the useless symbolism poured into Tumpy denies the state of reality.

[Hoodat]

I don't believe that. Thomas, Alito, and Barrett, perhaps.

We'll see.  I am fully confident about Gorsuch, but not so much with Kavanaugh who is too political for my taste.

[roamer_1]

We'll see.  I am fully confident about Gorsuch, but not so much with Kavanaugh who is too political for my taste.

Yes, we will see. But IMHO the SCOTUS will never fix it. What will fix it is a Congress jealous of its powers. But as always. throw the Tea Party away for Tumpism... Worry about the President rather than the statehouses and the Congress where the power lies. And thirty years from now it will still be the very same.

[Hoodat]

The TEA Party got tossed away the day after election day 2010.

[libertybele]

Should the leftists get control of the Senate, we will have a whole new worry -- they have promised to pack the courts and I have no doubt that they will.

[Hoodat]

Should the leftists get control of the Senate,  .  .  .

With the latest statement from Georgia SOS Brad Raffensperger, things are not looking good.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

You condemn Trump for using EOs in lieu of getting policies through an obstinate adversarial congress, even if the policy itself is morally correct and even, as in this case, it saves lives.

IMO you have no credibility where the subject of Trump is concerned.

Go ahead and get your last word. I'm going back to my crayons.

He also has nothing to offer on the subject of the 2020 Presidential election as he admits he did not participate in it.

[roamer_1]

He also has nothing to offer on the subject of the 2020 Presidential election as he admits he did not participate in it.

Why does that matter?