Author Topic: OCTOBER 2020 U.S. Military Forces in FY 2021-Army  (Read 134 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
OCTOBER 2020 U.S. Military Forces in FY 2021-Army
« on: November 18, 2020, 11:00:37 am »
OCTOBER 2020 U.S. Military Forces in FY 2021

Army

Mark F. Cancian

This is part of the CSIS series U.S. Military Forces in FY2021. The U.S. Army plans slow expansion through FY 2025, but a constrained budget environment will force it to choose between maintaining the units it has and building new kinds of structures. With modernization, the Army has increased production of proven systems and shifted billions into development of high-priority programs to prepare the Army for great power conflict.KEY TAKEAWAYSâ–ª

â–ªAfter a dip in personnel strength in FY 2019, both regular and reserve components have recovered. FY 2021 targets include: regular Army, 485,900; Guard, 336,500; and Army Reserve, 189,800.

â–ªThe regular Army and Army Guard project small increases through FY 2025; the Army Reserve will stay essentially level. This represents a substantial reduction to earlier growth plans, but probably the most expansion that can be done in the current budget and security environment.â–ªNew air and missile defense units are entering the force. Security Force Advisory Brigades continue despite their focus on stability operations. Other new kinds of units, such as the widely discussed multidomain brigades, remain mostly conceptual.

â–ªThe active-reserve mix has stabilized at 52 percent Guard/Reserve, 48 percent active. There is now less tension between regular Army and its reserve components as a result of closer consultations, higher overall budgets, and shared recruitment challenges.

▪Army modernization, which forms the basis for future forces, is a mix of good and bad news: the good news is that the Army continues production of proven systems and has a well-modernized force as a result. More good news is a few new systems are coming out of the research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) “primordial soup.” The bad news is that the Army is still several years away from having a new generation of systems in production to take it into the 2020s and beyond and set it up for potential combat against great power adversaries.

â–ªIn an environment of constrained resources, the Army will need to cut existing Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs) if it wants to build new units and procure new systems. So far it has been unwilling to do this.

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/201028_Cancian_FY2021_Army.pdf
« Last Edit: November 18, 2020, 11:01:41 am by rangerrebew »