American presidential elections do not have "do-overs".
Nor, for that matter, do the overwhelming majority of elections in which fraud was discovered.
It's completely ridiculous to compare what happened in Florida in 2000 to what just happened last November 3rd. That's like comparing a private plane crash landing into a barn vs. two commercial jets flying into the twin towers of the World Trade Center.
Even if the elections in, say, just Georgia, Pennsylvania and Michigan are found to have been disrupted by significant instances of fraud, there aren't going to be "new elections ordered".
At the very most, there will be a recount and validation of the ballots received on November 3rd. Good luck on getting that done before December 8th, on which the state slates of electors must be certified for the upcoming Electoral College on December 14th.
And that also assumes that the "recount" will be done in good faith with a sufficient number of observers from our side.
I hear it ain't goin' that way down in Georgia.
So... short of the numbers changing to Mr. Trump's favor in a recount (which will only come about if many thousands of "biden votes" can be disqualified), I see no pathway forward that will otherwise change the results.
The ONLY other option I can see is if the state legislatures of the states involved move to set aside the election results on the evidence that they were tainted and corrupted (and hence the end totals cannot be trusted to indicate what the actual vote "of the people" was). The state legislatures could then send their own slate of electors to the Electoral College.
Who would care to predict the legislatures that will do this...?
Fishrrman's credo:
Reality is what it is. It is not what we believe it to be.
I'd like to "see our reality" lead to a reversal of fortune for Mr. Trump, and I'm as much of a supporter of his accomplishments as anyone else here.
But... in accordance with "the credo"... I just can't.
I hope to be proven wrong.
But I call 'em as I see 'em... and that's the way I see it.