Generalizing on the concept, if government :
(a) refuses to protect the territorial integrity of the country by securing the border;
(b) refuses to maintain basic law and order in the streets of the country's major cities;
(c) fails to protect historically and culturally significant locations and monuments on public land
then why do we need government?
@HoustonSam We don't. In FACT,we are already without a government in a sense.
Surely the preservation of order and national identity are government's most fundamental functions.
No. The preservation of individual freedoms and the protection of our way of life by preserving the Bill of Rights are the fundamental reason we have a government.
Currently,neither seems to be happening,and it is the DNC's fault,not Trumps.
IF Trump were to respond to this now,the media would tag him as a fascist trying to preserve slavery,etc,etc,etc. The deck is stacked,and there is nothing he can do about it because he is really fighting the globalists hiding behind the Dims,and no matter what he did,any deaths and destruction would be blamed on him.
The left has been planning this and working towards it for nearly a century,and Trump is the new guy having to deal with the legacy of weak RINO and Dim presidents.
The only hope is the left pushes too hard,and gives him not only legal justification to step in and crush them,but he ends up having the backing of Steve and Sara Sushi,also.
And I really do think they are so arrogant at this point they will stop even pretending they are pro-American before the elections happen.
BUT......,IF the Dims get mail in ballots,America is over. Might as well grab your rifles and start marching on DC the day Biden/Hillary is sworn it because if you don't,your friendly neighborhood police will start confiscating them the next day,and telling you that you now need police permission to travel further than 10 miles from home,and a permit to prove it.
Perhaps it's time for the rest of us to make clear to our elected leaders what we require of them, and what could be the consequences if they fail to meet those requirements. And I don't mean merely that they might not be re-elected. I mean that we simply will no longer comply. If anarchists will not be subject to law, then why should we submit ourselves to it?
There it is!