Schumer to introduce 'no PR Act' to stop Trump from placing name on stimulus checks

[mystery-ak]

Schumer to introduce 'no PR Act' to stop Trump from placing name on stimulus checks
By Justin Wise - 04/27/20 07:52 AM EDT

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is reportedly planning to introduce a provision that would prevent President Trump from placing his name on any additional coronavirus stimulus checks.

The provision, dubbed the "No PR Act," would be included in the next coronavirus stimulus package and ensure that no federal funding would go towards"promotional material" that benefits Trump or Vice President Pence, Politico reported.

"Trump unfortunately appears to see the pandemic as just another opportunity to promote his own political interests,” Schumer said in a statement. “The No PR Act puts an end to the president’s exploitation of taxpayer money for promotional material that only benefits his re-election campaign.”

more
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/494764-schumer-to-introduce-no-pr-act-to-stop-trump-from-placing-name-on-stimulus

[Longiron]

All TRUMP has to do is execute the below with 100% authority. Why does he not do it? The DEMS would do this asap if a R was in your face like the Schmuck



In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of making use of Article 6, Section C3-P0 to allow the President the opportunity to legally remove Senator Schumer from office for his terroristic statements. The Article reads as follows:

“The Supreme Court remains an independent judicial body, outside the influence of government at any level. Should any government official take it upon himself to attempt to influence, coerce, intimidate, or threaten a Supreme Court Justice in order to sway decisions, that official shall be subject to discretionary removal at the hands of the sitting President of these United States.”

[catfish1957]

All TRUMP has to do is execute the below with 100% authority. Why does he not do it? The DEMS would do this asap if a R was in your face like the Schmuck



In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of making use of Article 6, Section C3-P0 to allow the President the opportunity to legally remove Senator Schumer from office for his terroristic statements. The Article reads as follows:

lol

[Cyber Liberty]

LOL.  I'd like to see Trump say, "OK, I won't have my name put on the checks."  And then replace the name with a small picture of Trump.

[libertybele]

LOL.  I'd like to see Trump say, "OK, I won't have my name put on the checks."  And then replace the name with a small picture of Trump.

For the love God doesn't Chuckie have anything else better to do with his time then to come up with crap like this?

[LegalAmerican]

For the love God doesn't Chuckie have anything else better to do with his time then to come up with crap like this?

AMEN!  These non-rights always want to take away any of his power.  TRUMP did not know, his name was even on this check, and why should it be an 'issue'?  TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT!   

[Hoodat]

Speaking of PR,  how does Schumer feel about his party naming a Senate office building after Richard B. Russell, the Democrat who led the filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act?