Live Thread: Impeachment Acquital

[aligncare]

@Right_in_Virginia

You are wasting your time. I believe she is a group of DNC people posing as a Christian female conservative in an effort to weaken Trump and other Republican chances for re-election. The Dims are both desperate and evil,which pretty much defines THIS "Christian Daughter",who probably drinks Scotch and smokes cigars.

I just wanted to memorialize your post here before, well, before whatever happens next. 

[libertybele]

@Chosen Daughter
@Victoria33

Please take the time to watch the videos (especially the first video -- links below).  Beck does connect the dots.  He has also mentioned on his program, not to take his word for it -- he has done the research --- do your OWN research.  The information is out there and easily obtained -- all you have to do is also connect the dots.

It might be helpful to put the hatred and preconceived notions aside and look at the reality.

Most importantly, the President of the United States has been ACQUITED.  He has been found NOT GUILTY yet here we sit.

This will be my last post on this thread.  I find it troubling that this witch hunt continues on in this forum.  I chose to move on.  I invite everyone else to as well.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHihyFsgJGc



www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCSwqca8KXU

[sneakypete]

I just wanted to memorialize your post here before, well, before whatever happens next. 

@aligncare

I have,by nature,a VERY low tolerance level for bullshit,outright lies,and purposeful deception. Frankly,I held out longer than I thought I would because I thought someone else would call her/him/Dim focus group out on their carefully staged plan to use stealth and lies to insure a Dim wins the WH. That didn't happen,so I let lose. Let the cards fall where they may because I no longer give a squat.

[catfish1957]

I just wanted to memorialize your post here before, well, before whatever happens next. 

I don't know.  Her intentions might be honorable.  But what she really needs to do is as I have.

I have made it no secret that that I dislike Trump as a person.  He's pretty damn dispicable as a human being. (IMO)

OTOH, we all need to compartmentalize the concepts of Donald Trump as friend or family versus the man as a leader.
Facts are
* that our economy is booming
* conservative judges are being filled that will help us for the next 30 years
* regulations are being lessened to help that boom
* promotion of energy independence to allow us to give OPEC/ME the finger
* Strenthening of the Miitary
* Border Attention

Now contrast that with the alternative....   Top 4 candidates for the dims include 2 certified avowed Socialist, an ultra left wing homosexual, and the leader of one of the most corrupt political crime families in U.S history.

Even if you absolutley hate Trump.  Anyone center or right on the politcal spectra is foolish not coalescing around Candidate Trump.  Any one of the Four Donkeymen of the Apocalypse will be a disaster for this country that has made so many gains economically the past 3+ years.

[sneakypete]

Now contrast that with the alternative....   Top 4 candidates for the dims include 2 certified avowed Socialist, an ultra left wing homosexual, and the leader of one of the most corrupt political crime families in U.S history.

Even if you absolutley hate Trump.  Anyone center or right on the politcal spectra is foolish not coalescing around Candidate Trump.  Any one of the Four Donkeymen of the Apocalypse will be a disaster for this country that has made so many gains economically the past 3+ years.

@catfish1957

Which IS the proof that she/he/the committee workgroup are Dim shills or Neo-cons,which are virtually the same critter.

[roamer_1]

@Right_in_Virginia

You are wasting your time. I believe she is a group of DNC people posing as a Christian female conservative in an effort to weaken Trump and other Republican chances for re-election. The Dims are both desperate and evil,which pretty much defines THIS "Christian Daughter",who probably drinks Scotch and smokes cigars.

Bullcrap @sneakypete

I've known @Chosen Daughter since Hector was a pup.

[Right_in_Virginia]

@Right_in_Virginia

You are wasting your time. I believe she is a group of DNC people posing as a Christian female conservative in an effort to weaken Trump and other Republican chances for re-election. The Dims are both desperate and evil, which pretty much defines THIS "Christian Daughter", who probably drinks Scotch and smokes cigars.

Interesting thesis @sneakypete .... I can't say I'd be surprised if this turns out to be true.

[roamer_1]

I don't know.  Her intentions might be honorable. 

Of course her intentions are honorable.

OTOH, we all need to compartmentalize the concepts of Donald Trump as friend or family versus the man as a leader.

LOL! No, we do not.

Character first and always. Because character will always out.

Now contrast that with the alternative....   Top 4 candidates for the dims include 2 certified avowed Socialist, an ultra left wing homosexual, and the leader of one of the most corrupt political crime families in U.S history.

Even if you absolutley hate Trump.  Anyone center or right on the politcal spectra is foolish not coalescing around Candidate Trump.  Any one of the Four Donkeymen of the Apocalypse will be a disaster for this country that has made so many gains economically the past 3+ years.

Absolutely not. Just yet another bid for the lesser evil.
Evil is evil, lesser or otherwise.

[catfish1957]

Absolutely not. Just yet another bid for the lesser evil.
Evil is evil, lesser or otherwise.

@roamer_1

Respectfully disagree.

I have come to conclusion that Trump's outrageous comments are a masterful strategic diversion to his enemies.  Think about it, he actually baited the Speaker of the House into tearing up his speech with every damned camera pointed at her.  Do you realize how badly that made her look?

And to the matter of lessers of evil's.  When it comes to the survival of this country, I don't think that is really a hard choice at all.  Based on what DJT has accomplished vs. the 4 Donkeymen of the Apocalypse?   Have you even listened or read any of the snipits of dim debates?  Those mofos are dangerous.

No I don't like Trump, but the alternative is lethal.

And one last edit:  I'll bet money there will be a SCOTUS appointment between January 21, 2021 and late 2024.  Who do you want making that appointment.

[roamer_1]

@roamer_1

Respectfully disagree.

I have come to conclusion that Trump's outrageous comments are a masterful strategic diversion to his enemies.  Think about it, he actually baited the Speaker of the House into tearing up his speech with every damned camera pointed at her.  Do you realize how badly that made her look?

Respectfully right back atcha. 

As to Pelousy, perhaps you should ask my whacko-liberal sister her perspective. Because it is diametrically opposing yours.

All y'all, both sides, have your heroes. All y'all, both sides, believe the others' media is lying. It is almost comical, standing outside of it all. It would be comical, except the thing that goes missing is the truth.

And to the matter of lessers of evil's.  When it comes to the survival of this country, I don't think that is really a hard choice at all.  Based on what DJT has accomplished vs. the 4 Donkeymen of the Apocalypse?   Have you even listened or read any of the snipits of dim debates?  Those mofos are dangerous.

There is no survival of this country without the principles that made her great.

And one last edit:  I'll bet money there will be a SCOTUS appointment between January 21, 2021 and late 2024.  Who do you want making that appointment.

You are pointing at the NYC liberal president and NWO Republicans and telling me they are more trustworthy?

Gimme a break. Not a chance in hell of that being true. I don't trust either side to make that appointment.

But then, I am a Conservative, so it should be no surprise that I don't trust government of any stripe.

[DCPatriot]

Oh, dear GOD!, buy a damn vowel, already ... educate yourself, woman.  Educate yourself! 

The ignorance in your posts is exhausting.

 

[Cyber Liberty]

@roamer_1

Do you really think "Tump" would select the same Judges as, say, a President Warren? 

[roamer_1]

@roamer_1

Do you really think "Tump" would select the same Judges as, say, a President Warren?

That is not the point.
Rather: Roberts was thoroughly vetted, touted as a great conservative. All the right organizations sung his praises. How is today any different? And when the chips were down, and the rubber met the road, Roberts screws the pooch.

That is the point.

[DCPatriot]

That is not the point.
Rather: Roberts was thoroughly vetted, touted as a great conservative. All the right organizations sung his praises. How is today any different? And when the chips were down, and the rubber met the road, Roberts screws the pooch.

That is the point.

Geezus...

It certainly IS the point.

If Hillary had given us 2 judges instead of Pres. Trump, you'd have been disarmed already.   

[roamer_1]

Geezus...

It certainly IS the point.

If Hillary had given us 2 judges instead of Pres. Trump, you'd have been disarmed already.

LOL! No I wouldn't. Guaranteed.

[Cyber Liberty]

That is not the point.
Rather: Roberts was thoroughly vetted, touted as a great conservative. All the right organizations sung his praises. How is today any different? And when the chips were down, and the rubber met the road, Roberts screws the pooch.

That is the point.

Here's another point:  Roberts was not nominated by "Tump," he was nominated by a severely weakened Bush, first as Associate Justice, then elevated to Chief Justice before being confirmed.  I don't think it's accurate to compare Roberts to, say, Gorsuch.

[catfish1957]

That is not the point.
Rather: Roberts was thoroughly vetted, touted as a great conservative. All the right organizations sung his praises. How is today any different? And when the chips were down, and the rubber met the road, Roberts screws the pooch.

That is the point.

You do realize that there is a lot of anecdotal evidence that there are skeletons in Justice Robert's closet, and that the Obama and the dims exploited that on important SCOTUS votes?

That tells me that the vetting sucked.  That's the lesson there.

[roamer_1]

Here's another point:  Roberts was not nominated by "Tump," he was nominated by a severely weakened Bush, first as Associate Justice, then elevated to Chief Justice before being confirmed.  I don't think it's accurate to compare Roberts to, say, Gorsuch.

Both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch come out of Kennedy's house. That is not encouraging. I might hold some hope for Gorsuch, but it is faint hope. I expect BOHICA.

[catfish1957]

Both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch come out of Kennedy's house. That is not encouraging. I might hold some hope for Gorsuch, but it is faint hope. I expect BOHICA.

If the next election is won by the dims, the next SCOTUS justice may be Obama.  How does that sound?

[roamer_1]

You do realize that there is a lot of anecdotal evidence that there are skeletons in Justice Robert's closet, and that the Obama and the dims exploited that on important SCOTUS votes?

That tells me that the vetting sucked.  That's the lesson there.

And the vetting now is no different. Though I do not need to believe in those skeletons. That shifts the blame to Roberts rather than the SOBs that put him in there. I am far more confident that he is exactly what he was picked for...  By moderate Republicans.

And that has not changed a whit.

[roamer_1]

If the next election is won by the dims, the next SCOTUS justice may be Obama.  How does that sound?

Don't care. Again with the lesser evil. That line of thinking removes all consequence for bad performance by Republicans.

[Cyber Liberty]

Both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch come out of Kennedy's house. That is not encouraging. I might hold some hope for Gorsuch, but it is faint hope. I expect BOHICA.

Line up the last 10 or so Justices named by Republican Presidents and you'd find most "grew in the job" within the first 5 years.  Like Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor, just to name the first three off the top of my head.

[Cyber Liberty]

Don't care. Again with the lesser evil. That line of thinking removes all consequence for bad performance by Republicans.

That assumes it's binary.  Kennedy, for all his disappointments, was far better than Ginsburg or Suiter. 

[roamer_1]

That assumes it's binary.  Kennedy, for all his disappointments, was far better than Ginsburg or Suiter.

In the same way, you could praise the Gang of Eight.

[roamer_1]

Line up the last 10 or so Justices named by Republican Presidents and you'd find most "grew in the job" within the first 5 years.  Like Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor, just to name the first three off the top of my head.

Exactly my point.