Good grief Tom, did you read the essay?
Chinese media is hyping the problem over here in an effort to make themselves look efficient and us inept. It is not in their interests to play down the issue here.
Chinese disinformation, depending on what side it falls on, makes China look good
Secondly, my remark also is in regards to the member's statement about people using their heads. If people are tossing out insults and slinging mud, that can go around.
The article also discusses that Stanford Professor, John Ionnidis. We've already been through that and Stanford's connections to China.
From the article:
9. Children and Teens aren’t at risk
Okay, maybe the article has a special context to this statement, so maybe I'm taking it wrong but what we do know:
Jennifer Zeng 曾錚
@jenniferatntd
·
1h
A rare case in #SouthKorea. 17 y/o boy tested negative for #CCPVirus #COVID19 7 times (out of 8 tests) died 6 days after showing symptoms. He could be the first minor who died of #coronavirus in the country.
韩国罕è§ç—…例:8次检查7次阴性 ç”·å©å‘ç—…6天åŽå޻䏖
https://twitter.com/jenniferatntd
Yes, there is a bit of a context to what the article says, it largely qualifies the statement, sure, children and teens still may require some hospitalization. I still don't think we should just talk in absolute terms "teens aren't at risk" if a fair number of them do suffer sickness still.
From the article at Medium:
A World Health Organization report on China concluded that cases of Covid-19 in children were “relatively rare and mild.†Among cases in people under age 19, only 2.5% developed severe disease while 0.2% developed critical disease.
Yeah, okay, not many of them suffer seriously but still, this is quite different than saying they are not at risk.