There's a thread on that article:
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,379953.0.html
approaching 50 posts....
Thanks for the link, seems you had some pretty strong opinions there, lol....
My problem with Peggy was things like this...
But the subject matter will probably have to be bigger than the Ukraine phone call, which is not, as some have said, too complicated for the American people to understand, but easy to understand. An American ally needed money, and its new leader needed a meeting with the American president to bolster his position back home. It was made clear that the money and the meeting were contingent on the launching of a probe politically advantageous to Mr. Trump and disadvantageous to a possible 2020 rival.
That was disingenuous because it left out the democrats using the area for Russian Conclusion (servers etc)... which left out the Biden and Hunter connection of funneling money to democrats (and much more). Her nutshell isn't even close to the full picture... and that is grounds to not like her. But I did learn some insight (gleamed like crops being picked a second time) into the impeachment.
It is not like she doesn't know the corruption.... She fully alludes to it later in the article...
It can’t look like the Deep State striking back at a president who threatened their corrupt ways.
Corruption that in her view runs both ways.... and in that view, I agree. Perhaps not so much about the Ukrainian stuff here, I think Trump had the right to dig into the can of worms the democrats opened. But other things Trump does like covering up things like Stormy and using connections (Falwell for example) to have some pastors bend doctrine/scripture to support someone like himself.
