You describe my argument as circular. Please explain.
Obviously not
@Cyber Liberty, and I am unsure of what he means by "circular." But I will tell you that seeing the same crap posted over and over is beyond boring.
A simple site specific google search with the terms "jazzhead" and "Heller" yields pages and pages of results... if we could search the database for those terms and count the results, it would yield the several hundreds of posts that you spam these threads with.
Any reasonable person of good intentions would realize that you are
not getting any traction with your ideas (and haven't for the years that you keep spamming them) that summarize to:
- Our natural law-based RKBA is 'granted' to us by the US government via the Second Amendment (
rejected and untrue)
- within the Second Amendment you believe a predicate clause intended to limit the Rights to some version of a militia (
rejected and untrue)
- only with the Heller opinion did the RKBA get
graciously extended by the SC, to individuals... (
rejected and untrue)
Posting the same rejected arguments another several hundred times is not going to convince anyone of your beliefs.
You were invited kindly by several people to join the relevant discussion of our RKBA and the so-called Red Flag Laws being proposed, within the terms that most members of this forum adhere to, and the Principles that undergird them. You balked at not being able to watch a video, now the entire presentation has been transcribed.
Rather than persist in being a spamming troll, why don't you engage in the discussion on the terms of the vast majority of the interested and engaged forum members, rather than constantly trying to shift the debate and language to the terms and beliefs that have been
clearly rejected here?