Author Topic: The Case Against Arms Control  (Read 232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
The Case Against Arms Control
« on: June 25, 2019, 09:58:51 am »

The Case Against Arms Control
.
By Peter Pry
June 24, 2019
 

Historically, U.S. modernization of its nuclear deterrent Triad—ICBMs, bombers, and missile submarines—has advanced hand-in-hand with arms control treaties.

Of necessity, the Trump Administration is breaking this longstanding precedent.

Long-delayed U.S. strategic forces modernization proceeds, while the U.S. withdraws from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty because of Russian cheating.  The U.S. may not renew the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), on which Russia is also likely cheating, because of growing nuclear threats from China.  The U.S. is even reversing course on the Presidential Nuclear Initiative (PNI) virtually eliminating U.S. tactical nuclear weapons, because of Russian non-reciprocity.

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2019/06/24/the_case_against_arms_control_114528.html