The stories emerging aver that the CP5 were "exonerated" because a confession was made by some other criminal whose DNA was found on the woman.
The facts are the CP5 were in the park attacking many people that night which they don't deny.
They not only confessed to beating her in front of detectives, they all had family members in the interview room with them. A number of them bragged to friends about beating and violating the woman.
But because lack of DNA evidence (which was in its infancy at the time and likely much of destroyed by investigators) of the five has people believing they're innocent.
How did people get convicted before DNA testing? There are still people convicted today without DNA evidence.
They're guilty as hell.