That has to be challenged on the Federal level. Neither State has a RKBA written in their State Constitution (two of the six who don't).
If the Federal RKBA isn't enough, then Roe should not apply to the States, either.
I do not see how anyone could interpret the constitution as not applying RKBA to all states.
Conversely I do not see how anyone can find the specific right to an abortion as an accessory to some nebulous right to privacy.
But then I’m not a student of the law. I just happen to be conversant in English.