Yet again I repeat - a pre-viable fetus has no legal rights vis a vis its mother.
According to Pennsylvania law.
The PA law confirms that.
No, it does not confirm anything since there is nothing that comes before it. The Pennsylvania law creates the BASIS -
within Pennsylvania. Other States establish their own precedents by creating their own laws.
The fact that it defines certain crimes committed by third parties against a mother which also happen to harm her fetus do not convey legal rights upon the fetus.
Again, within Pennsylvania, from the law you cited.
The crimes are not committed "against the unborn child"
The phrase "against the unborn child" is a direct quote from the law. So yes, they are crimes committed "against the unborn child".
they are committed against the mother and the fetus she is carrying.
If a person takes egregious action against "the mother" which results in the death of the child, but not the death of "the mother", the law defines that as murder/manslaughter (a crime) against only the child and not the mother.
This is getting boring, Hoodat.
Boring? You should be worn out from all the dodging and weaving you have been conducting. For post after post after post, I have asked you for the legal basis for your opinions. And this time, you actually gave one - a Pennsylvania law - a law that epitomizes Amendment X being put to action. The law is a textbook case of a State determining its own laws when it comes to the life of an unborn baby, which has been my contention from Day One. And for three years, I have witnessed you rail against the right of Pennsylvania or any other State from doing exactly that.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander. If you insist on relying on Pennsylvania Commonwealth law to absolve a mother of any wrongdoing in the harm or injury to her unborn baby, then I should be afforded the same right here in Georgia to establish our own laws that reflect the goals of our society. Capisce?