Author Topic: The Myths of Traditional Warfare: How Our Peer and Near-Peer Adversaries Plan to Fight Using Irregul  (Read 225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
The Myths of Traditional Warfare: How Our Peer and Near-Peer Adversaries Plan to Fight Using Irregular Warfare

Reyes Cole

Introduction

Military leaders received a post-holiday gift on January 19th of 2019, in the unveiling of the new National Defense Strategy (NDS). The document is exactly what the services have waited for since the fall of the Soviet Block: designated high-end threats. Threats on which the services can effectively focus their efforts in capability development and prioritize service funding. Per the  NDS Summary the central challenge to U.S. prosperity and security is “strategic competition.”[1] Revisionist powers and peer threats such as China and Russia seek regional hegemony. Rogue regimes and near-peer threats like Iran and North Korea continue to create regional instability. And lastly, threats from designated Violent Extremist Organizations (VEOs) will persist. However, the services seem to be focusing less on competition, in lieu of focusing energies into traditional warfare scenarios and capabilities.

https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/myths-traditional-warfare-how-our-peer-and-near-peer-adversaries-plan-fight-using