Author Topic: FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it By John Solo  (Read 891 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 419,548
FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it
By John Solomon, opinion contributor — 02/20/19 08:10 PM EST

For most of the past three years, the FBI has tried to portray its top leadership as united behind ex-Director James Comey’s decision not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for transmitting classified information over her insecure, private email server.

Although in the end that may have been the case, we now are learning that Comey’s top lawyer, then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”

The revelation is contained in testimony Baker gave to House investigators last year. His testimony has not been publicly released, but I was permitted to review a transcript.

During questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas), Baker was unequivocal about his early view that Clinton should face criminal charges.

more
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/430881-fbis-top-lawyer-believed-hillary-clinton-should-face-charges-but-was
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,579
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it
By John Solomon, opinion contributor — 02/20/19 08:10 PM EST

For most of the past three years, the FBI has tried to portray its top leadership as united behind ex-Director James Comey’s decision not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for transmitting classified information over her insecure, private email server.

Although in the end that may have been the case, we now are learning that Comey’s top lawyer, then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”

The revelation is contained in testimony Baker gave to House investigators last year. His testimony has not been publicly released, but I was permitted to review a transcript.

During questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas), Baker was unequivocal about his early view that Clinton should face criminal charges.

more
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/430881-fbis-top-lawyer-believed-hillary-clinton-should-face-charges-but-was

I still believe she should be doing time in the graybar hotel right now!
Scientists, like all discoverers of truth, have always asked, "What?” “How?” “Why?” “What if?” and “Why not?” Questioning science is science.

Jaeger, John . Brilliant Creations : The Wonder of Nature and Life (p. 5). Kindle Edition.

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,314
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
Why did Solomon talk them out of it?   :smokin:
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,829
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
John Solomon has been all over this story, and is doing a great job of actual investigative reporting.

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,579
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
John Solomon has been all over this story, and is doing a great job of actual investigative reporting.

Should, but definitely won't, get a Pulitzer prize!
Scientists, like all discoverers of truth, have always asked, "What?” “How?” “Why?” “What if?” and “Why not?” Questioning science is science.

Jaeger, John . Brilliant Creations : The Wonder of Nature and Life (p. 5). Kindle Edition.