Author Topic: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete  (Read 1323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« on: January 01, 2019, 05:05:18 pm »
Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
Last Updated: December 31, 2018 7:05 PM

    Ken Bredemeier
    Michael Bowman
 

U.S. President Donald Trump acknowledged Monday that not all of the barrier he wants to build along the Mexican border would be a concrete wall he has long called for.

"An all concrete Wall was NEVER ABANDONED, as has been reported by the media," Trump contended in a Twitter remark. He was disputing John Kelly, his outgoing White House chief of staff, who said in an interview over the weekend that the Trump administration discarded the idea of a "solid concrete wall" early in Trump's two-year tenure as president.

But Trump conceded, "Some areas will be all concrete but the experts at Border Patrol prefer a Wall that is see through (thereby making it possible to see what is happening on both sides). Makes sense to me!"

https://www.voanews.com/a/trump-us-mexican-border-wall-would-not-be-solid-concrete/4722784.html
« Last Edit: January 01, 2019, 05:05:56 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,792
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2019, 01:03:50 am »
It should be solid concrete, the entire length.
Works for the Israelis...

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2019, 02:48:10 pm »
It should be solid concrete, the entire length.
Works for the Israelis...

Not all of the Israel border wall is solid concrete.  There are places where it is better to be able to see the other side.



https://www.timesofisrael.com/gaza-sea-barrier-nears-completion/
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,792
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2019, 04:51:02 pm »
That pic above still looks impressive.
Looks like TWO "walls" there (probably separated by a "strip" on which patrol vehicles can drive.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2019, 05:09:12 pm »
That pic above still looks impressive.
Looks like TWO "walls" there (probably separated by a "strip" on which patrol vehicles can drive.

Agreed.  Solid concrete is not required to make a useful wall.

Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44,154
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2019, 08:35:58 pm »
That pic above still looks impressive.
Looks like TWO "walls" there (probably separated by a "strip" on which patrol vehicles can drive.

I sure as heck would not be caught dead driving in that strip... A week of observation and all range finding and timing would be calculated, with no ability to evade, no randomization.

That's a screaming friggin death chute.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,792
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2019, 01:24:48 am »
roamer wrote:
"I sure as heck would not be caught dead driving in that strip"

Sections of the Berlin Wall were built that way, with a paved strip for the Stasi to patrol on.

I was there (went through the wall to the other side, too...)

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2019, 01:28:18 am »
Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete

Of course it won't. Porous concrete breaths better in hot climates. 

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2019, 02:08:55 am »
I don't think it can be the same structure all the way through.  Different sites will call for different types of barrier.

Offline To-Whose-Benefit?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,613
  • Gender: Male
    • Wulf Anson Author
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2019, 06:07:08 am »
For all the money Congress burns the could build the effing thing out of titanium.
My 'Viking Hunter' High Adventure Alternate History Series is FREE, ALL 3 volumes, at most ebook retailers including Ibooks, Barnes and Noble, Kobo, and more.

In Vol 2 the weapons come out in a winner take all war on two fronts.

Vol 3 opens with the rigged murder trial of the villain in a Viking Court under Viking law to set the stage for the hero's own murder trial.

http://wulfanson.blogspot.com

Online GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,033
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2019, 07:18:23 am »
For all the money Congress burns the could build the effing thing out of titanium.
Considering how things have been going, I expect it will be made of unobtanium, not titanium.

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,032
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Trump: US-Mexican Border Wall Would Not Be Solid Concrete
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2019, 07:46:12 am »
I don't think it can be the same structure all the way through.  Different sites will call for different types of barrier.
Bingo! Very good, and you go to the head of the class. Different geological substrates will require different engineering approaches and to some degree will determine what sort of barrier structure would be most cost effective while retaining efficacy. Where solid bedrock is near surface, solid concrete is a possibility, where there are deep and relatively unconsolidated sediments, fence lines may be more stable and cost effective.


It makes no sense to try to erect a barrier that will fall over because the foundation won't hold.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis