The Open-Borders Crowd’s “Imaginary Constitution” Says Everywhere Must Be a Sanctuary City

[rangerrebew]

 The Open-Borders Crowd’s “Imaginary Constitution” Says Everywhere Must Be a Sanctuary City
avatar By David Jaroslav   August 24, 2018 6 Comments


In one lawsuit after another, the hypocritical and upside-down vision that the open-borders crowd has of the U.S. Constitution becomes clear.  States and local governments, they assert, have an absolute choice to adopt sanctuary policies, but they have no choice not to.  That’s not much of a choice, is it?  But it’s the absurd inescapable logic of what’s been called the “Imaginary Constitution.”  Disregarding federal immigration law isn’t just permitted—it’s actually mandatory.

Under the Imaginary Constitution, the Tenth Amendment means California or Oregon can be sanctuary states, but Texas or Arizona can’t be anti-sanctuary states.  States are apparently absolutely free to ignore and even interfere with federal law, but absolutely not free to support or cooperate with it.

https://immigrationreform.com/2018/08/24/the-open-borders-crowds-imaginary-constitution-says-everywhere-must-be-a-sanctuary-city/

[Fishrrman]

Who wrote this “Imaginary Constitution" of which you speak?

Unicorns...?