Where is the word “email†in that phrase?
It isn't. Only a complete idiot would look for the word 'email' in a treatise on the limitations of government. The key phrase is about unreasonable searches and seizures, period.
If it wasn’t written into the Constituion explicitly, then by the consensus of the wise here . . .
Uh, no. That's your own made-up bullshit of an argument, and a very weak and stupid one at that. As Ayn Rand once wrote, the Constitution is not a charter of government power, but a charter of citizen's protection against its government. The people's protection against unreasonable search and seizure is not limited to what could be taken by force at the point of a musket, just as the freedom of the press not limited to what can be produced by a manual printing press, or as freedom of speech is not limited to what can be spoken from atop a wood crate in the public square.
. . . it’s an act of judicial tyranny to read the word into the Constituion.
The main difference here is that you nor anyone else sharing your views are 100% unable to read the word 'abortion' into the Constitution. This is self evident. Ever since first joining this forum, I have challenged any and all of the Roe-tyranny supporters to cite the Constitutional basis for that decision. And not one has ever taken me up on it. Not a single one. And why do you think that is? Could it be because no such Constitutional basis exists?
Yet here you are with your 'email' bullshit, hoping that it suffices as a substitute for something you know in your heart does not exist - a Constitutional basis for Roe.
So, again, please underline the word “email†where it expressly appears in the Fourth Amendment.
It's right beside the word 'segregation'. (See: Plessy)