Author Topic: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'  (Read 5659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,034
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« on: June 02, 2018, 12:53:37 pm »
June 2, 2018
Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
By Rick Moran

The New York Times headline reporting on the May jobs numbers that came out yesterday might go down in history:

    "We ran out of words to describe how good the jobs numbers are"

    The real question in analyzing the May jobs numbers released Friday is whether there are enough synonyms for “good” in an online thesaurus to describe them adequately.

    So, for example, “splendid” and “excellent” fit the bill. Those are the kinds of terms that are appropriate when the United States economy adds 223,000 jobs in a month, despite being nine years into an expansion, and when the unemployment rate falls to 3.8 percent, a new 18-year low..

    “Salubrious,” “salutary” and “healthy” work as words to describe the 0.3 percent rise in average hourly earnings, which are up 2.7 percent over the last year — a nice improvement but also not the kind of sharp increase that might lead the Federal Reserve to rethink its cautious path of interest rate increases.

Did aliens slip some mind altering drug into the brains of New York Times editors?

No, but someone needs to give Nancy Pelosi a happy pill.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/pelosi_strong_employment_numbers_mean_little.html
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,513
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2018, 12:58:31 pm »

We don't want people working!
We want more people on welfare, dammit!
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2018, 01:19:21 pm »
No, employment means little, but defending the honor and integrity of MS-13 murderers is essential. 10631

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2018, 01:20:17 pm »
The unemployment figure is as rigged today as it was during the Obama regime. 

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2018, 01:23:40 pm »
The unemployment figure is as rigged today as it was during the Obama regime.

So you agree with Pelosi that things are worse now then under Obama?

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,247
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2018, 01:24:52 pm »
The unemployment figure is as rigged today as it was during the Obama regime.

 :bigsilly:

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2018, 01:25:03 pm »
So you agree with Pelosi that things are worse now then under Obama?

/snicker

Put the bottle down Frank. 

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2018, 01:32:46 pm »
/snicker

Put the bottle down Frank.

Yeah, because that question was irrelevant and over the line.

If your thermometer has been off 12 degrees for the last 9 years, does that mean you don't have any hot days anymore? That is what you are saying because Obama started using U3 or U2 numbers and we are using the same now to measure Trump. It is still usable to measure positive and negative.

BTW if you use U6 number they are still way better now than just a couple years ago. We went from 9.4 at the end of Obama to 7.6 today for total unemployment.

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2018, 01:37:24 pm »
Yeah, because that question was irrelevant and over the line.

If your thermometer has been off 12 degrees for the last 9 years, does that mean you don't have any hot days anymore? That is what you are saying because Obama started using U3 or U2 numbers and we are using the same now to measure Trump. It is still usable to measure positive and negative.

BTW if you use U6 number they are still way better now than just a couple years ago. We went from 9.4 at the end of Obama to 7.6 today for total unemployment.

Put the bottle down, Frank.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,247
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2018, 01:44:28 pm »
Put the bottle down, Frank.

I'm sure Frank will when you do.

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,384
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2018, 02:36:16 pm »
 Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'

I am sure she believes this.
She thinks weak employment numbers mean a lot more.
It gives her the opportunity to give out more Fedgov goodies (aka; our money), thereby increasing the likelihood that she will be re-elected over and over again.
Without that, she wouldn't have lasted this long.

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2018, 02:40:57 pm »
I'm sure Frank will when you do.

[unnecessary insulting language removed. -- Mod1] 
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 01:04:45 pm by Mod1 »

Online 240B

  • Lord of all things Orange!
  • TBR Advisory Committee
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,549
    • I try my best ...
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2018, 02:56:20 pm »

One thousand dollars! Are you kidding me!? I have my government servant wipe my government ass with a government $1000 dollars. One thousand dollars is what I spend on a government hair cut. I piss on $1000. That is just breakfast money. When you work for the government, and you actually 'make', in a literal sense, money. Then money no longer has any meaning to you.
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.
If they kill their own with no conscience, there is nothing to stop them from killing you.
Rational fear and anger at vicious murderous Islamic terrorists is the same as irrational antisemitism, according to the Leftists.

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2018, 03:22:17 pm »
Well lucky for her we don't have strong employment numbers. Otherwise her statement would sound even more foolish than it already does.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline Emjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,687
  • Gender: Female
  • Womp, womp
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2018, 03:46:04 pm »
:bigsilly:

It may be funny to you but it ticks me off.  The reliable, unending negativity of a few people on this board makes me forget it's Saturday and we have a puppy.
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,531
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2018, 03:48:40 pm »
The unemployment figure is as rigged today as it was during the Obama regime.

Yup.  U3 has to be the most cooked book in the lot.  Didn't believe it then, don't believe it now.  That said, the other books that are not as cooked (like U6) are looking better too.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,531
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2018, 03:51:35 pm »
It may be funny to you but it ticks me off.  The reliable, unending negativity of a few people on this board makes me forget it's Saturday and we have a puppy.

That puppy abounds with kyootness, too.   ^-^
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2018, 03:53:51 pm »
It may be funny to you but it ticks me off.  The reliable, unending negativity of a few people on this board makes me forget it's Saturday and we have a puppy.

Then go spend time with your puppy. 

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,034
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2018, 03:54:59 pm »
Ahhh yes, you and Frank, drunk as skunks even when you’re sober as church mice.

Enough of that.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,384
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2018, 03:58:14 pm »
Wasn't it somewhere in the 90's when the U3 number became the "official" number?
1992-1994 maybe?

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,531
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2018, 03:58:30 pm »
Well lucky for her we don't have strong employment numbers. Otherwise her statement would sound even more foolish than it already does.

Yeah, they're government numbers, so there's good reason to doubt them.  That's why I like looking at the ADP numbers that also come out about the same time.  ADP is a private payroll company, they've been showing positive growth over the past year or so, and they also had crappy numbers while Obastard's Labor Department was lying through their teeth about employment.

(Full disclosure:  ADP is the company that processes my paychecks.)
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • For there is no respect of persons with God. Romans 10:12-13
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,890
  • Gender: Female
  • Ephesians 6:13 Stand Firm in the face of evil
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #21 on: June 02, 2018, 08:24:04 pm »

We don't want people working!
We want more people on welfare, dammit!

That witch should get on her broom and ride far, far away!
AG William Barr: "I'm recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time."

Alexander Acosta Labor Secretary resigned under pressure concerning his "sweetheart deal" with Jeffrey Epstein.  He was under consideration for AG after Sessions was removed, but was forced to resign instead.

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • For there is no respect of persons with God. Romans 10:12-13
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,890
  • Gender: Female
  • Ephesians 6:13 Stand Firm in the face of evil
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #22 on: June 02, 2018, 08:26:37 pm »
Yeah, they're government numbers, so there's good reason to doubt them.  That's why I like looking at the ADP numbers that also come out about the same time.  ADP is a private payroll company, they've been showing positive growth over the past year or so, and they also had crappy numbers while Obastard's Labor Department was lying through their teeth about employment.

(Full disclosure:  ADP is the company that processes my paychecks.)

I am always doubtful about the accuracy. 
AG William Barr: "I'm recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time."

Alexander Acosta Labor Secretary resigned under pressure concerning his "sweetheart deal" with Jeffrey Epstein.  He was under consideration for AG after Sessions was removed, but was forced to resign instead.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,531
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #23 on: June 02, 2018, 08:30:13 pm »
I am always doubtful about the accuracy.

You and I are of a skeptical bunch....
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,332
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
Re: Pelosi: 'Strong employment numbers mean little'
« Reply #24 on: June 02, 2018, 08:30:56 pm »
I am always doubtful about the accuracy.

Due to the terminal TDS of the MSM, there's no way the Trump administration would put forth phony numbers.

Only when the media glows and praises an administration should the numbers be suspect.
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald