I got curious about how big a deal this was. We've got 10 million 17-24 year olds who are eligible, and a total military of a little over 2 million. Just how many of those 10 million do we need (assuming we maintain the current demographics)?
So I looked it up.
There are about 850,000 military members under the age of 25. This is 40% of our military (43% of active, 34% of reserves). That means that 2.5% of our population under 25 are serving, or 8.5% of the eligible population under 25.
That 8.5% number was higher than I expected, and seems like a possible concern. There's got to be an upper limit on that number based on those who want to serve, and I was surprised that it was at least 8.5%.
The article did seem suspicious in a couple areas, for example:
Previous criminality prevents one of every 10 young adults from being able to join the Armed Forces—meaning that 3.4 million people who would otherwise make the cut are unable to join.
Well, sort of, as long as you are only counting those who aren't also ineligible for other reasons. I'd bet willing to bet that a lot of those 3.4 million are also ineligible because they also didn't graduate. Those people weren't counted twice in arriving at that 24 million number were they? [It's that "who would otherwise" phrase that bugs me, it belongs on the cause clause, not the effect, IMO].