Nolte: New York Times NAMBLA-izes Pre-Teen Boys Wearing Eye Makeup

[Emjay]

One of the healthiest of human instincts is to feel your stomach roll over at the sight of sexualized children. Though we might not be able to articulate it, there is a big difference between a little kid playing grownup and, say, this… And that is not a little girl, by the way; that is a young boy as photographed by the left-wing New York Times.

If you share this healthy instinct, this particular Times Thanksgiving Day piece, an article tailor-made to appeal to the pedophile/pederast demography, will undoubtedly bruise a piece of your soul.

Written by Bee Shapiro, the article features no less than six photographs of adolescent and even prepubescent boys wearing and putting on women’s makeup, and even posing in uncomfortably suggestive ways — including this ten-year-old.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/11/27/nolte-new-york-times-nambla-izes-pre-teen-boys-makeup/

[Emjay]

Ain't this sweet?

[Emjay]

So the old Grey Lady finds her true calling.

[Sanguine]

This photo has haunted me for years:

[DiogenesLamp]

This photo has haunted me for years:

I have always wondered how people could say that homosexuality is natural and acceptable,   but adults being attracted to children is not.   


On what basis can you claim that the one is okay,  but the other is sick?   


@Jazzhead

[DiogenesLamp]

Ain't this sweet?

That bothers me just looking at it.   Someone needs a good @ss whipping. 

[Millee]

That bothers me just looking at it.   Someone needs a good @ss whipping.

Agreed. 

[driftdiver]

I have always wondered how people could say that homosexuality is natural and acceptable,   but adults being attracted to children is not.   


On what basis can you claim that the one is okay,  but the other is sick?   


@Jazzhead

About 15 years ago I was an elder for a Presbyterian church and was researching for an upcoming vote.   The vote was on the role of homosexuals in the Church.   We all know PCUSA has since approved it but at the time they had not.

I couldn't sleep for 3 days after spending about 4 hours researching.   Up until 1978 the homsexuals and the pedophiles worked together to normalize their agenda.   It was in 78 that the gays broke away as they felt the pedophiles were hurting their movement.   Not because they disagreed with their behavior but because it hurt them in the public square.

Have no doubt, normalization of pedophilia is on its way.

[bolobaby]

I have always wondered how people could say that homosexuality is natural and acceptable,   but adults being attracted to children is not.   


On what basis can you claim that the one is okay,  but the other is sick?   


@Jazzhead

Oh, they base that all on consent.

At which point you have to ask, "OK, what about bestiality? Oh... don't lecture me on consent - that dog is humping your leg!"

[DiogenesLamp]

Oh, they base that all on consent.

They do till I point out that homosexuals were regarded as "non compos mentis"  and could not give legal consent either.   


Up until 1973,  Homosexuality was regarded as a mental illness.   According to the law in existence prior to that time,  they couldn't give consent.   

At which point you have to ask, "OK, what about bestiality? Oh... don't lecture me on consent - that dog is humping your leg!"

I've pointed that out myself on previous arguments on this topic.