Everybody wants to go to Columbia school of journalism. They crank out liberal journalists by the boatload. Those are the hires that make it to National newsrooms.
This is going to be a tough nut to crack, to break the stranglehold of the liberal media.
No one said it wasn't. As I tried to point out earlier, though, I'd expect Conservative media to do better on Radio, because radio does not require a person to be looking at a screen. You can listen while doing other things. Television wants all your attention, as a medium, and that is incompatible with doing ahything but watching.
Print, aside from the interwebs, is a mess, but so much of what passes for writing in a newspaper should have been left on the bathroom wall or in the margins of someone's coloring book that it is seldom worth the price of admission. Assuredly, Conservatives have our good writers who could easily rival the drivel in Time and Newsweek.
The Liberals have been building their media empire since the advent of television, and far longer in print. Once there was a difference between Huntley and Brinkley and that Cronkite fellow, but now the same story is used with the same talking points and the same phraseology across the spectrum--the only question is what face you want to see it pour out of, or what 'rack' you are looking at when it does--because that is about all the difference.
So it will take a new angle to build a Conservative media if you want TV, but I probably would not start in markets that are used to and in love with the coastal urban liberal media. That doesn't mean RFD TV, but something from a smaller town, with a little more blue collar attitude might play very well because people would be better able to identify with it than East/West Coast big city.
But then I could be wrong, too.
