Author Topic: (SCOTUS) The petition of the day is: Collins v. Virginia 16-1027  (Read 1047 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,662
SCOTUSblog Kate Howard Petitions Posted Mon, May 1st, 2017 Link: http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/05/petition-of-the-day-1151/

Issue: Whether the Fourth Amendment’s automobile exception permits a police officer, uninvited and without a warrant, to enter private property, approach a house and search a vehicle parked a few feet from the house.

Amicus Brief filed by: William J. Olson, P.C on 3/27/2017  Link: http://lawandfreedom.com/wordpress/collins-v-commonwealth-of-virginia/

Today we filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a deeply flawed decision of the Virginia Supreme Court involving the Fourth Amendment.  The cased involved different ways that courts evaluate the constitutionality of searches and seizures.  The search in this case was of a motorcycle under a tarp located what is known as the “curtilage” of a home, or the area immediately surrounding it.  Under the deeply flawed rule the Virginia Supreme Court applied, the Fourth Amendment has no bearing at all whenever an automobile or anything that resembles an automobile is being searched, irrespective of where the automobile is located.

The government argued that the atextual exception to the Fourth Amendment known as the automobile exception applied, and the Virginia Supreme Court agreed.  We argue that the Virginia Supreme Court should have applied the rule of Jones v. United States and Florida v. Jardines.

geronl

  • Guest
Re: (SCOTUS) The petition of the day is: Collins v. Virginia 16-1027
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2017, 01:33:18 am »
There's an automobile exemption in the fourth amendment??

Hang on...
Quote
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I don't see it.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,662
Re: (SCOTUS) The petition of the day is: Collins v. Virginia 16-1027
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2017, 01:55:22 am »
There's an automobile exemption in the fourth amendment??

Hang on...
I don't see it.

atextual

Adjective

(comparative more atextual, superlative most atextual)

    Not textual; not derived from written works.
    (law) Of an interpretation of a statute or similar governing provision, derived from something other than the text of the provision.

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,016
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"
Re: (SCOTUS) The petition of the day is: Collins v. Virginia 16-1027
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2017, 04:16:34 am »
SCOTUSblog Kate Howard Petitions Posted Mon, May 1st, 2017 Link: http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/05/petition-of-the-day-1151/

Issue: Whether the Fourth Amendment’s automobile exception permits a police officer, uninvited and without a warrant, to enter private property, approach a house and search a vehicle parked a few feet from the house.

Amicus Brief filed by: William J. Olson, P.C on 3/27/2017  Link: http://lawandfreedom.com/wordpress/collins-v-commonwealth-of-virginia/

Hope they take this one and strike it down.  Be a decent first test for Gorsuch -- it's one of those cases where Scalia would have sided with the property owners, but some other conservatives might side with the government.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2017, 12:06:51 pm by Maj. Bill Martin »

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: (SCOTUS) The petition of the day is: Collins v. Virginia 16-1027
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2017, 04:50:20 am »
Just read the case. It is interesting. Collins is an idiot for putting a stolen bike in his yard on Facebook. The cop is an idiot for not getting a warrant. He had plenty of time to get one from the testimony. You can't go on private property under the vehicle exception.

http://law.justia.com/cases/virginia/supreme-court/2016/151277.html