Dems: Silencing Warren amplified her message

[mystery-ak]

Dems: Silencing Warren amplified her message
By Mike Lillis - 02/08/17 03:53 PM EST

BALTIMORE — Many Democrats are up in arms over the Senate GOP’s move to silence Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on the chamber floor this week.
 
Just don’t tell Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.).
 
The head of the House Democrats said Wednesday that the GOP’s maneuver was a gift to the Democrats opposing Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) for attorney general because it amplified Warren’s protest message — and that of the late Coretta Scott King, whose words Warren had invoked — many times over.
 

more
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/318556-dems-silencing-warren-amplified-her-message

[DiogenesLamp]

The Liberal coalition media amplified "her" message and deliberately ignored the truth of the matter.   



If there was equal access of a "right"  media to the airwaves,  this wouldn't even be a story. 



We would point out how the left media is lying and they would drop it. 


Actually,  if they knew we could publicly rebut their false assertions,  they wouldn't put them forth in the first place. 


And this wouldn't be a story. 


Also,  if Elizabeth Warren knew she would have a right media with the same access to the public as the left has,   she wouldn't even try this stunt in the first place. 

[Wingnut]

That is media spin.   Little squaw has no wampum.

[skeeter]

Warren violated Rule 19 of Senate rules by imputing a motive to a fellow senator on the floor. It had nothing to do with muzzling her message.

They just can't help but lie.

[Sanguine]

Warren violated Rule 19 of Senate rules by imputing a motive to a fellow senator on the floor. It had nothing to do with muzzling her message.

They just can't help but lie.

Yes, but then they make media points when they lie about the lies.

[Frank Cannon]

Dems: Silencing Warren amplified her message

Probably, but it is a garbage message that most people disagree with. Basically she is amplifying her stupidity.

[libertybele]

I'm trying to figure out what message she was sending?  One of being a whack-a-do or one of liberal hysteria?

[Norm Lenhart]

It's pathetic that Democrats can get the idea that a thing is the opposite of itself broadcast as a factual reality. Worse is that many in America are so stupid as to believe it.

If you amplify silence, you get silence (and maybe a bit of line noise), not some resounding, echoing thunder of a liberal speil.

[endicom]

"Dems: Silencing Warren amplified her message"


I can't heeeere you!

Does anyone know what was her message?

[skeeter]

"Dems: Silencing Warren amplified her message"


I can't heeeere you!

Does anyone know what was her message?

Not sure but my guess is it was 'Sessions is a ra-a-a-aacist'.

[libertybele]

Not sure but my guess is it was 'Sessions is a ra-a-a-aacist'.