Author Topic: Anti-Trump Elector Chris Suprun Paid For Ashley Madison While Bankrupt And Married With 3 Kids  (Read 2899 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-13/exposed-anti-trump-elector-chris-suprun-paid-ashley-madison-while-bankrupt-and-marri



Quote
Anti-Trump Texas faithless elector Stephen Christopher “Chris” Suprun, who wrote a widely-shared op-ed in The New York Times about his decision, in which he claimed ideological superiority over Trump, which would prevent him from voting for the President-elect on December 19 as he is required, joined and paid for cheating website Ashley Madison in 2012, using the same address registered to his 9/11 charity, while bankrupt, likely unemployed, and married with three young kids, after he and his working wife owed over $200,000 to multiple creditors — and that’s just the start of it.


Anti-Trump Texas Elector Stephen Christopher Suprun. Source: Twitter

GotNews’ research into Suprun’s bizarre and unexplained flip-flop against President-elect Donald J. Trump turned up Ashley Madison data, damning bankruptcy records, and a series of P.O. boxes and what appears to be an association with a payday loan scam site.

Since turning against the decision of the people of Texas to elect Trump, Suprun also became a client of a “social justice media strategy” PR firm run by left-wing CNN commentator Van Jones.

What is going on here?

There’s a lot to go through, so bear with us and keep reading:

Tons more at link.

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,305
Hahahaha!


That Ashley Madison crap has ruined so many lives, but this primadonna so needed a reality check. Glad he got one. No secret I'm not a Trump fan, but I don't like stealing the election.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
Hahahaha!


That Ashley Madison crap has ruined so many lives, but this primadonna so needed a reality check. Glad he got one. No secret I'm not a Trump fan, but I don't like stealing the election.

Its not stealing an election.

Its completely constitutional for he and other electors to go against the will of the mob of the moment. Otherwise there's no point in having an electoral college, electors, delegates or representatives.

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,305
Its not stealing an election.

Its completely constitutional for he and other electors to go against the will of the mob of the moment. Otherwise there's no point in having an electoral college, electors, delegates or representatives.


Once we go down this road, every election is simply a recipe for chaos IMO. I don't like Donny any more than you do, well maybe a little bit more, but he should be president.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist

Once we go down this road, every election is simply a recipe for chaos IMO. I don't like Donny any more than you do, well maybe a little bit more, but he should be president.

And calling an elector doing what he is constitutionally allowed to do "stealing and election" isn't a recipe for chaos? The American people are far too misinformed as it is now.

Thank God many of the delegates voted for independence from Great Britain against the will of the voters.

(Not to mention this attempt to shame the guy into compliance is just more leftist behavior)


« Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 11:28:50 am by Cripplecreek »

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
Honestly, I don't believe there is a widespread revolt among the electors.  Historically, there have been very few dissenting votes in the Electoral College.  Most will vote as they are supposed to.  This guy is just looking for his 15 minutes of fame. 

I just wish these disgruntled idiots would shut up.  The election is over and Trump will be our next president.  I'm not happy either, but it's long past time to move on.

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,488
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Source of the article: Charles C. Johnson. (Not to be confused with Charles F. Johnson, who infamously flipped to the left after Obama was elected.) Charles C. Johnson's notorious for pushing fake scandals. A quick Internet search turns up a litany of false news reports and abusive behavior, so much that he's apparently been permanently banned from Twitter.

Roger Stone's name was in the AM data hack, too... but he at least admitted what it was really about: political hacks throw their opponents' names into the mud all the time.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024

Offline Gefn

  • "And though she be but little she is fierce"-Shakespeare
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,600
  • Gender: Female
  • Quos Deus Vult Perdere Prius Dementat
Wow, truth really is stranger than fiction.

This article is priceless. Thanks for finding it
 
« Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 12:46:26 pm by Freya »
G-d bless America. G-d bless us all                                 

Adopt a puppy or kitty from your local shelter
Or an older dog or cat. They're true love❤️

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,369
  • Gender: Male
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?  What will happen when this new administration has access to all Internet data? 

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?  What will happen when this new administration has access to all Internet data?

No you aren't alone.

Its the Alinsky behavior that I warned would drag conservatives to the left.

Online GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,390
  • Gender: Male
I too am bothered by the intrusion into people's private lives.
Okay, he should vote for Trump, as Trump won Texas.
He should be replaced by someone who will, if he refuses to do so.
End of story.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?  What will happen when this new administration has access to all Internet data?

Nope, when I saw this on another site that was my exact thought. They have no qualms destroying anyone who stands in their way or doesn't agree with them.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
Nope, when I saw this on another site that was my exact thought. They have no qualms destroying anyone who stands in their way or doesn't agree with them.

Well it was posted at zero hedge by a guy using the fictional anarchist/bomber name of Tyler Durden and followed by a bunch of commenters who sound like rabid animals.

Online Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,104
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"

Its completely constitutional for he and other electors to go against the will of the mob of the moment. Otherwise there's no point in having an electoral college, electors, delegates or representatives.

That doesn't follow logically at all.

First, at least one purpose of the Electoral College (if not the only one) is to give extra weight to the votes of smaller states.  It also ensured that states could not unfairly swing an election by reporting a higher number of votes for one candidate or the other.  It eliminated the issue of trust or potential fraud among the several states because the number of electoral votes was determined long before the election.  Those purposes/advantages are not affected in the least by a requirement that electors vote as directed by their states.

Second, the Constitution leaves it up to the legislatures of each to decide how electors should be picked -- there isn't even a requirement for a popular vote at all within each state.  So that is the point at which the representational function would have been built in to the system to the extent one was required.

Third, the claim that electors acting on their own is consistent with a "representative theory" founders on the fact that the names of the actual electors don't even appear on the ballot in most states.  And even when they do, they are likely to be ignoramuses of which very few voters have even heard.  So, voters are not "choosing their representatives" for their intelligence, wisdom, judgement, or with the intention that they'll think independently because  the don't even know who the Electors are when they cast their votes.  They're voting for the name of the President, not the name of the elector.

Finally, the entire structure of the system supports the idea that the election of the President and Vice-President is intended to be determined by the states, and if the states wish to secure their decision by a requirement that the electors they appoint follow the direction of the Legislature, that is not remotely inconsistent with the Constitution.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 02:27:54 pm by Maj. Bill Martin »

Offline kevindavis007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,502
  • Gender: Male
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?  What will happen when this new administration has access to all Internet data?


Nope.. I didn't like when the left did it to us.. We should not emulate them at all..
Join The Reagan Caucus: https://reagancaucus.org/ and the Eisenhower Caucus: https://EisenhowerCaucus.org

Ronald Reagan: “Rather than...talking about putting up a fence, why don’t we work out some recognition of our mutual problems and make it possible for them to come here legally with a work permit…earning here they pay taxes here.”

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?  What will happen when this new administration has access to all Internet data?

I don't like it either.  I'm also disturbed that some electors are being pressured or threatened into voting for Hillary.  There was an item on our local TV news about a woman elector who was receiving death threats.  She is committed to Trump and was not about to be pressured into voting any differently. She already haa the FBI and local police working on her case.  Might be difficult or impossible to do, but I hope the perpetrators are caught, tried and sent to the hoosegow for a lengthy sentence.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
I don't like it either.  I'm also disturbed that some electors are being pressured or threatened into voting for Hillary.  There was an item on our local TV news about a woman elector who was receiving death threats.  She is committed to Trump and was not about to be pressured into voting any differently. She already haa the FBI and local police working on her case.  Might be difficult or impossible to do, but I hope the perpetrators are caught, tried and sent to the hoosegow for a lengthy sentence.

We saw plenty of threats during the primary season as well.

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
We saw plenty of threats during the primary season as well.

True.  And both sides are culpable.  I guess they want mob rule.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?  What will happen when this new administration has access to all Internet data?

No. This dude has been a queer bird the whole election. First he was against Donny and then he was for Donny. Then after the election he writes a bizarre piece in the NY Times stating to be against Donny again. In that group of Electors calling for an intelligence briefing, he is the only GOP one. This guy has been a red flag for months and after reading this one can see why. He is open to the highest bidder.

Some anti-Trumpers deserve some scrutiny.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 03:09:37 pm by Frank Cannon »

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,488
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Am I the only one on this forum who is disturbed that anyone who goes against Trump is subject to vicious, viral reputation-smears?
Of course you're not. Like I said, consider the source: this is another fake news article, just like Pizzagate. It's precisely why I refused to vote for Trump.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,305
Well it was posted at zero hedge by a guy using the fictional anarchist/bomber name of Tyler Durden and followed by a bunch of commenters who sound like rabid animals.


Zero Hedge is an idiot site, founded and written by idiots, and finally read and believed by idiots. They have predicted 10 of the last 1 recessions. They're a bunch of buttholes and conservatives seem to treat them like gospel. Zero hedge will make you poorer, not richer.

Offline Emjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,687
  • Gender: Female
  • Womp, womp
Its not stealing an election.

Its completely constitutional for he and other electors to go against the will of the mob of the moment. Otherwise there's no point in having an electoral college, electors, delegates or representatives.

I have a few things to say on this subject.

One, I did not know what Ashley Madison is.  So I must be living in some kind of alternate universe like I always accused the trumpers of living in. 

Two, this guy is obviously a creep but doesn't it disturb anyone at all that this kind of digging into personal lives and revenge happens?

Three, I disagree that a delegate should be allowed to change his or her vote.  What good was all the voting if someone we elected and trusted gets to throw away the will of the people who voted.
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.

Offline Emjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,687
  • Gender: Female
  • Womp, womp
I wrote my post before reading the other posts and was glad to see that I was not at all the only one offended and scared by this kind of public sliming of someone people are mad at.
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,305
I have a few things to say on this subject.

One, I did not know what Ashley Madison is.  So I must be living in some kind of alternate universe like I always accused the trumpers of living in. 

Two, this guy is obviously a creep but doesn't it disturb anyone at all that this kind of digging into personal lives and revenge happens?

Three, I disagree that a delegate should be allowed to change his or her vote.  What good was all the voting if someone we elected and trusted gets to throw away the will of the people who voted.


The Ashley Madison hacking stuff is out there in the public. Very trivial to search through it to find someone.


If you're name is in that hack, don't do any primadonna stuff, or you open yourself up to that kind of stuff.

Offline Emjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,687
  • Gender: Female
  • Womp, womp

The Ashley Madison hacking stuff is out there in the public. Very trivial to search through it to find someone.


If you're name is in that hack, don't do any primadonna stuff, or you open yourself up to that kind of stuff.

Okay, I looked up Ashley Madison and I am a sadder and more depressed person for having done so.

I must have lived my life in a bubble.
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.