There is a reason there is an electoral college. To keep New York and California from electing a president. If you adhere to and believe in the constitution you would never question it!!!
He is not weakened. That is democrat spin, which must be your belief too.
I always thought you were a dem. Now I know you are. The only people that challenge the electoral college are!!!
He had 306 to her 235. THAT IS A MANDATE!! Along with all the other races. Aside from NC. The dems stole it here from our governor. Every republican won by a good margin but him. Due to Durham County being allowed to stay open much later due to supposed voting problems. NC has 17 days of early voting, so this is bullshit!
So you keep parroting the dem talking points. It is befitting of you!
The GOP HAD A GREAT election and we are happy as hell
You on the other hand have nothing!
First, you don't know diddly about me, as is evident from your post. Try again; or rather, please don't, it gets tiresome.
Second, he's already repudiated a whole slew of those campaign promises you said were the only reason he was worth voting for. What happened to that holy vow made during the debate that if he won he would have Clinton investigated? That was a solemn vow then, but it's nothing more than a turd on his shoes now that he got what he wanted out of you. And the wall? Whatever happened to that? Now we have amnesty in all but name.
I've got plenty: mostly the thrill of watching just how far you can contort yourself mentally trying to convince yourself that his lies really weren't lies.
And lastly, the Electoral College serves many good purposes - I wholeheartedly agree with it, as you would know if you ever read what I posted instead of reading what you thought I posted - but creating a popular mandate is not one of them. One of the purposes of the electoral college is to bring certainty in a reasonably short period of time to a process that by its nature could drag on forever. That it does with dispatch. However, it does it sometimes despite the popular will; it is not always in conformity with the popular will. And in those cases, you get a president who lacks a popular mandate; who cannot blithely assume that a majority of the populace wants him to enact his agenda.
That is what Trump is: a technical winner who lacks a popular mandate. Get used to it, or you're going to end up being even more disappointed than you will be in any event, as he tacks further and further to the left - on that point you could consult with Ann Coulter, who has already called him on that.