To put it bluntly the constitution was carefully constructed to prevent mob rule which is naked democracy. They purposely put in place many paths to block the majorities whims. Hence "checks and balances".
hah hah Author Robert Heinlein often referred to these sort of mindless, unruly, poorly-educated, marginally useful people as "yammerheads". One of their most prominent qualities is that virtually nothing that they say or do makes much sense and another is that they are very angry and demonstrative of that anger.
There are two basic types of anger - normal and psychotic (schizoaffective).
Normal anger results from frustration born of failure, or willful injury done to one by another by overt intention or neglect.
Most likely these poor souls are angry because of normal frustration due to their own failures to have their material or emotional needs met in relation to the election. But they respond as if someone has by voting, done something deliberately or grossly neglectful to injure or harm them personally.
Since many of these same people demonstrated severe detachment from reality during the campaign (which led them to support Hill-O-Lies Clinton) it makes perfect sense that their detachment from reality would continue after the election and influence how they react to losing.
People of lower intellect often engage in assigning "guilt by proximity". In other words, they assume that whoever is involved with or in proximity to them when they feel great anger is RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR PROBLEM.
Dullards often do not understand that anger sometimes arises simply from frustration at failure to get something that one desires or feels entitled to greatly, but that there is not always someone who is rightfully to blame for causing that anger. They feel angry and believe that whoever is standing in front of them or in the room with them is RESPONSIBLE for causing their anger.
So many of their behavior problems result from not understanding normal boundaries for responsibility. They believe that it is another's responsibility to make them happy or not feel frustrated anymore.
Some of them mutate into full-fledged psychotic rage - working themselves up into beliefs about some vague or distant powerful nefarious force or person which is deliberately, intentionally causing them harm (through willful injury or neglect).
An example of that is how the Nazis convinced themselves that all of Germany's problems were caused by the Jewish population of their nation and around the world. That psychotic delusion took hold and became realized in actions and an entire world war.
That is the dangerous aspect of psychotic anger - if enabled or exploited by unscrupulous agents, it can be expanded to become something horribly destructive - both to those who engage in it and especially to those who are attacked as a result.
The anger of losing an election is closer to the sort which arises when stubbing one's toe. It is normal to feel some anger when one stubs one's toe. What is not normal is to blame whoever is walking down the street with you for the fact that you stubbed your toe, nor for the fact that you are very angry about it.
