Last Day Before Election: Most Major Polls Have Hillary Clinton Winning

[Norm Lenhart]

Four years of less insanity is that much better of a chance for me to help my children get on their feet,   but no,   it does not look as though it is possible to solve the underlying pathology.   


The nation put a gun to it's head in 1962 and in 1963 it pulled the trigger.   

The pathology of America's destruction is a population that thinks you can get conservative/constitutional governance by fear voting for liberals. Once you and yours stop thinking magically and start thinking about cause and effect, we might cobble together enough people to elect someone that actually might TRY governing from the right.

[Norm Lenhart]

Yup,people like you because you are proud of being an idiot and voting to stop the biggest danger America has ever faced.

America may just end within the next 4 years,and it will be people like you who will be primarily responsible for it because when you COULD have done something to prevent it from happening,you sat on your asses and played smug little toads.

People like me did do something to prevent it. We stood on principle. Until last week, you were one of us. Then you drank the kool aid and became a Trump shill for liberalism.

[jmyrlefuller]

Chances are you will never have to say that again after this election,because this may be the last one we have.

*snicker*

You don't seriously believe that, do you?

[sneakypete]

What you just posted makes absolutely no sense in the real world.

If you think andy supported Hillary in any sense of the word, you've gone round the bend.

@musiclady

Did he vote against her dictatorship when he had the chance,yes,or no?

[DiogenesLamp]

@skeeter

NOT going to have any impact on them at all because even at this late date they would rather see Bubbette! stacking the supreme court with leftists that EVER admit they were both wrong and acting childish.

Whenever this point is made,   I always dive into my movie history and pull out this bit. 





"Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision. "

[skeeter]

I've been thinking for years that a smart move on my  part would be to just shut up and stop posting online commentary about our "rulers."     


I may possibly live to regret the things i've said about Hillary.

'Hundred Flowers' - it worked for Mao.

And Hillary does kinda dress like him.

[Norm Lenhart]

It's remarkable how the people who are supporting a hard core liberal are now blaming conservatives for electing another hard core liberal.

It's an upside down world.

But we knew that when we began to be mocked for having principles and values during the primary cycle.

And now we are being mocked for not giving up on the things that now liberal voters said they once had.

It's an upside down world......

But look at who is mocking us. Liberals. IE, no one of value.

[Norm Lenhart]

*snicker*

You don't seriously believe that, do you?

Look who is saying it. A Trump shill.

[musiclady]

@musiclady

Did he vote against her dictatorship when he had the chance,yes,or no?

That's what makes no sense.

He voted in the Republican primary, and is a highly intelligent, thoughtful principled man.

What you're accusing him of is just silly.

[Sanguine]

I've been thinking for years that a smart move on my  part would be to just shut up and stop posting online commentary about our "rulers."     


I may possibly live to regret the things i've said about Hillary.

I'd be happy seeing you regret some of the things you've said about your fellow posters here.

[musiclady]

People like me did do something to prevent it. We stood on principle. Until last week, you were one of us. Then you drank the kool aid and became a Trump shill for liberalism.

You got that right.

Values that turned on a dime, and turned from 'conservative' to hard core liberal, and now mocking what he claimed once to believe.

VERY revealing.....

[jmyrlefuller]

Yup,people like you because you are proud of being an idiot and voting to stop the biggest danger America has ever faced.

America may just end within the next 4 years,and it will be people like you who will be primarily responsible for it because when you COULD have done something to prevent it from happening,you sat on your asses and played smug little toads.

Yeah, like voting for a megalomaniac who will do anything to get his way, including donating to Hillary, is going to stop the supposed collapse of the republic that is coming if a woman weaker than Obama gets in.

Only one of the two candidates you're comparing consistently talks about how "only I can" change things, fix things, etc. Only one is openly musing about a dictatorship. It's not Hillary Clinton.

Hillary is your run-of-the-mill, over-the-hill Democratic politician.

So ream on me all you want about how supposedly I'll be guilty if Trump loses. I won't be if Trump wins and we turn out to have been right all along.

[Norm Lenhart]

I'd be happy seeing you regret some of the things you've said about your fellow posters here.

Don't waste a lot of time worrying about Trump supporters. Afterall, nor one of them spoke against the many threats about revenge and hunting us down with dogs made by their fellows.

[andy58-in-nh]

@musiclady

Did he vote against her dictatorship when he had the chance,yes,or no?

I intend to vote against her. I just won't vote for the other putative dictator whose rule you might prefer. They both stink on ice. I'm thinking I'll vote for someone who doesn't. 

[skeeter]

*snicker*

You don't seriously believe that, do you?

Oh there'll be another election.

But with tens of millions of newly minted citizens helpfully registered as democrats their outcome will be preordained.

[sinkspur]

Let me put to rest this ridiculous assertion that Donald Trump is just a reality star.

You're of course referring to The Apprentice. And here's why you folks are grasping at straws.

The show's concept needed a successful businessman to star in it so Donald Trump was selected to headline The Apprentice, which is a reality-based, unscripted, business based show. Donald starred in the show for 11 years while he continued to oversee The Trump Organization, but the show is still running and is beginning its 15th year in January.

And the fact is, Donald Trump's contribution to the show made it wildly successful. It was nominated for nine Emmys.

But, first and foremost Donald Trump was and is a hugely successful businessman, probably one of the biggest and best known real estate developer in the world before being hired to do The Apprentice.

So he is not just "a reality TV star." The man personally owns a worldwide real estate empire. The Trump Organization has about 500 companies. Reality star? That was just one of his gigs.

But, as numerous examples here have shown us, you haters gotta hate.

He's not even the biggest in New York:

The NY Observer, owned by Trump’s son-in-law, only put Trump as the fourteenth most powerful person in New York City real estate in 2013. Trump didn’t even crack the top 10 in power rankings of real estate developers and power brokers from three different publications — Commercial Observer, the New York Post, and the Real Deal.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/trump-often-claimed-to-be-the-largest-real-estate-developer?utm_term=.imzxrm9aL#.opOJaoBe8

[musiclady]

I intend to vote against her. I just won't vote for the other putative dictator whose rule you might prefer. They both stink on ice. I'm thinking I'll vote for someone who doesn't.

 

[Sanguine]

Yeah, like voting for a megalomaniac who will do anything to get his way, including donating to Hillary, is going to stop the supposed collapse of the republic that is coming if a woman weaker than Obama gets in.

Only one of the two candidates you're comparing consistently talks about how "only I can" change things, fix things, etc. Only one is openly musing about a dictatorship. It's not Hillary Clinton.

Hillary is your run-of-the-mill, over-the-hill Democratic politician.

So ream on me all you want about how supposedly I'll be guilty if Trump loses. I won't be if Trump wins and we turn out to have been right all along.

There will be more elections.  Maybe like the Dutch do it.  They only put things to vote that really don't matter.  Everything else is decided for them.

[DiogenesLamp]

*snicker*

You don't seriously believe that, do you?

I seriously do.   Oh,  we will have "elections".  We will go through the symbolism and ritual of pretending to ask the voters what they want,    but after millions of additional socialists are let into the country and given the right to vote,   we will only ever after have socialists elected.   


You don't seriously believe you will ever win another election if Hillary lets in millions of illegals and grants them amnesty?   Do you?   

[Norm Lenhart]

Oh there'll be another election.

But with tens of millions of newly minted citizens helpfully registered as democrats their outcome will be preordained.

Then perhaps people should not have nominated a guy that wants a big beautiful door in his wall that will never be built.

[Bigun]

I intend to vote against her. I just won't vote for the other putative dictator whose rule you might prefer. They both stink on ice. I'm thinking I'll vote for someone who doesn't.

I already have done exactly that!

[DiogenesLamp]

I'd be happy seeing you regret some of the things you've said about your fellow posters here.

I would be happy if events transpired such that I won't need to add more vitriol to what i've already said.     


I actually see myself as having exercised considerable restraint in my criticism.   

[skeeter]

Then perhaps people should not have nominated a guy that wants a big beautiful door in his wall that will never be built.

Right. But here we are in the general election - do we vote for the candidate of dubious credibility who says he might do something about the problem; or the candidate who flat says she'll naturalize them all?

Do we vote for the candidate of dubious credibility who says he'll reduce our taxes; or the candidate who flat says she'll raise them?

Do we vote for the candidate of dubious credibility who says he'll nominate SCOTUS justices who hew to the Constitution; or the candidate who flat says she'll select leftist political ideologues?

[Norm Lenhart]

I would be happy if events transpired such that I won't need to add more vitriol to what i've already said.     


I actually see myself as having exercised considerable restraint in my criticism.   

Then don't. You can start by stopping the repetition of disprove leftist talking points and accusing conservatives of supporting liberals.

[DiogenesLamp]

Oh there'll be another election.

But with tens of millions of newly minted citizens helpfully registered as democrats their outcome will be preordained.

They aren't getting that.    They either don't seem to have thought of it,   or cannot wrap their mind around it.   


This is the last Hurrah.    Voting will be like working a stick in an airplane with the aileron cables shot away.