I guess it depends on who you talk to. I have heard Canada, Kenya, and even Indonesia.
The "Kenya" thing was a red herring. The known logistics simply do not work for him to have been born in Kenya. The only plausible possibilities are that he was either born in Hawaii, or he was born near the North Western border with Canada, possibly in Canada itself.
Personally I think there is good circumstantial evidence to indicate he wasn't born in Hawaii, but was instead born either in Canada, or NorthWest Washington State.
Also that Stanley Ann Dunham's lack of years in residence after the age of 14 made her ability to confer citizenship a question.
That is only an issue if he was born in a foreign country. If he was born inside the US, it is of no matter.
And then, there is the 'birth certificate' a layerd electronic construct pretty widely accepted as bogus. Ask Loretta Fuddy about that. (Oops, you can't. The M.E. said she died of an arrhythmia even though she had never been diagnosed with any heart condition at all, after surviving (with all others on board) ditching a plane between islands. (She ties into the Subud Cult, too, which goes back to Indonesia, but that's another story). So, no, that issue was far from agreed upon.
Lord Monckton offered what I regarded as the simplest proof that the document is forged. Typewrites space letters at exact distances on a page. On this document, when you mark off the correct spacing on a line with supposedly typewritten text, the letters do not fall in the correct spacing. The lines also do not space correctly in the vertical dimension.
These sort of spacing errors are only possible on a typewriter if you release the paper from the platen and move it manually. Something that no one would have any reason to do while typing an official document.
But the Cruz issue did hit the press, and the courts before Trump got the nomination--in fact, it was one of Trump's weapons aimed at Cruz.
This was during the time the press was trying to help Trump. They felt Trump's more outrageous behavior would help divide the social conservatives from the rest. Of course much of our side fell right into their trap.
And yet, there he was, still on the ballot.I honestly think Cruz versus Hillary would have come down on Cruz as victor. After all, if half the people who claimed to have supported Cruz , but are now supporting Trump in desperation actually supported Cruz, he should have won.
They would have portrayed Cruz as both a Right wing Dictator and a Cotton Mather religious fanatic. They would have also accused him of being a hypocrite and pushed those Adultery allegations. They would have said he hated poor people because he tried to shut down the government. And so on.
People think Cruz would have been an easy win because that's what they wish to believe, but I do not believe they are accurately taking into account all the factors we would be facing.
The fact is, elections are mostly at the mercy of Liberal Democrats who live and work in New York, and control almost all access to broadcast information. So long as they have the microphones and cameras and we don't, we will never be able to confidently advance our candidates.
