And, in case
@GAJohnnie or any of the Trumpettes still don't understand why it's a logical fallacy, let's outline in terms even a Trumpette can understand:
@Frank Cannon only drinks scotch. One year, Frank goes to his class reunion and there is only wine and beer to drink. Frank says he would *never* be caught dead drinking wine. So, therefore, he must *want* a beer? Or, is he *obligated* to drink beer? Is he *supporting* "team beer" because he refuses to drink wine OR beer?
In the same vein, bolobaby only votes for conservatives. One election year, the so-called "conservative" party decides to nominate a NY liberal shyster. bolobaby says he would *never* be caught dead voting for that two-faced charlatan who fooled the rubes in the primary. So, therefore...?
Trumpette insistence on supporting this laughable logical fallacy actually only ensures that they will never win any converts. Every time they bring it up in lieu of actually presenting REAL arguments for why Trump should be trusted only serves to demonstrate that Trumpettes truly are amazingly ignorant and not really the kind of people with whom I want to be associated. I mean - seriously - when I point out to a Trumpette the CLEAR hole in the argument... plainly show that X does not follow Y... and they insist on repeating the same dumb-arse argument over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over...
Well, c'mon. Why would I *ever* hitch my wagon to such an embarrassing bunch of sycophantic parrots?