@Smokin Joe
Trump wants the United States to become energy independent.
There are two ways to do that, and if those flyover country people just didn't use so much oil...
Trump would back off many of the punitive regulations that are holding back the domestic energy industry production.
Name one.
One of Trump's biggest supporters is the CEO of Continental Resources, Harold Hamm who many consider to be the next Energy Secretary.
More work needs to be done to study the effects of fracking, and accommodations will have to be made with local municipalities and tribes, but to suggest that Trump wants top 'shut down' the oil industry while that takes place is an outright falsehood.
If you don't think the Obama administration has poked and prodded every pore of that critter, you haven't been paying attention. How Mr. Hamm and Mr. Trump deal with each other is up to them. Maybe his competitors will get the lion's share of the scrutiny "more study" entails.
In over ten thousand wells in this state alone there are zero incidences involving pollution of surface water from a frac, no earthquakes, none of the evils that have been attributed to fraccing.
Extensive campaigns of sampling well water before drilling oil and gas wells have been undertaken in the Marcellus Shale areas, and the result is that while complaints of contamination have fallen off (because there is baseline data showing whether or not that occurs), there have been no substantiated incidents of groundwater contamination--nor would any be expected by anyone who knew even the basics about how these wells are constructed.
Mr. Trump may be in thrall to the Ethanol Lobby, whom he has promised great things, but then his aircraft don't use ethanol--it isn't in aviation fuels. Maybe he is a fan of windmills (so long as they don't block his view), or maybe he thinks renewables are the key, but messing with the oil industry won't get us anywhere.