Trump Can’t Keep Himself From Attacking Republicans For One Month

[Vulcan]

Hmmm   Don't know what Cruz's eligibility has to do with the subject of this thread

It doesn't.  It was a lame attempt by that poster at a diversion from Trump's abject stupidity.  It failed.

[Longmire]

He should be going after Hillary, he's got precious little time left to do that.

Trump took 30 seconds to smack down that nsubordinate, nasty, open borders apologist.

He's moved on to something new hours ago, while you all flounder in his wake.

Really quite amazing how Trump creates his own news cycle.

[musiclady]

Not really...do you think you're some kind of Constitutional scholar? 

Explain how Cruz is eligible for the office of President then, and please be specific.

The funny thing is that I don't consider myself a "Constitutional scholar."

But what I know could fill a swimming pool, and what Trump knows wouldn't even fill a thimble.

You're backing a fool, son.  And my guess is that you don't care any more about the Constitution than he does.

And that's less than nothing......

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Yeah...Republicans like Bill Clinton (NAFTA) , Barak Obama (TTIP, TPP) and now unless Trump wins...Hillary Clinton.

Sure RR got the ball rolling with a modest proposal to create a North American Union, but that is a far cry from what transpired.

The notion that "free trade" has been a net positive for the US is also statistical nonsense belied by the empty factories, loss of good paying jobs and crumbling infrastructure.

NAFTA passed the House with 132 GOP votes and 102 rat votes.  It passed the Senate with 34 GOP votes and 27 rat votes.  This was at a time that rats had majorities in both chambers of Congress.

The numbers are even more stark for TTIP and TPP but I'm not going to bother looking them up for you, because we both know you are being disingenuous when you call free-trade a bipartisan issue.  The GOP helps rat presidents pass free-trade bills.  The rats stand in the way.  It has been this way for the last 40 years.

[musiclady]

It doesn't.  It was a lame attempt by that poster at a diversion from Trump's abject stupidity.  It failed.

Arguing for Trump and using the Constitution ALWAYS fails.

I'm not sure why these Trump zealots even try it.  It's stupid.

[musiclady]

Hmmm   Don't know what Cruz's eligibility has to do with the subject of this thread, which is a thin-skinned nominee who can't concentrate on the task at hand and instead chooses to whine about Republicans.  He should be going after Hillary, he's got precious little time left to do that.

It doesn't have anything to do with anything.

It's a diversionary tactic that's so stupid a third grader could see through it.

Then again, that's pretty close to the maturity/intellect of your average Trump troll.....

[Longmire]

@musiclady that's quite the non-answer...in legal parlance they'd call it non-responsive. 

[sinkspur]

Trump took 30 seconds to smack down that nsubordinate, nasty, open borders apologist.

He's moved on to something new hours ago, while you all flounder in his wake.

Really quite amazing how Trump creates his own news cycle.

That's about all the time Trump spends on Hillary.  30 seconds.

He moved on to creating more confusion about his immigration plan.  Now he says he probably won't deport non-bad guys.  Which is not what he said last Wednesday.

Here's a hint:  as long as the news cycle is about Trump and his boneheaded gaffes, he's losing.

[musiclady]

@musiclady that's quite the non-answer...in legal parlance they'd call it non-responsive.

Well, you asked a question that's already been answered.

In legal parlance that's called not caring about the truth, and being a trouble maker whose agenda has nothing to do with the law, the Constitution, or reality.

That's why you're a missionary for a corrupt, liberal liar on a conservative forum.  Truth isn't a factor for you any more than clever parlance is......

[Longmire]

NAFTA passed the House with 132 GOP votes and 102 rat votes.  It passed the Senate with 34 GOP votes and 27 rat votes.  This was at a time that rats had majorities in both chambers of Congress.

Yes, members of both parties supported and opposed the bill.

That sounds like a text book definition of bi-partisan, do you disagree?

[Longmire]

Well, you asked a question that's already been answered.

No, it hasn't been answered, and specifically it hasn't been answered by you.

My advice for the future is take smaller bites and chew slowly.

[musiclady]

No, it hasn't been answered, and specifically it hasn't been answered by you.

My advice for the future is take smaller bites and chew slowly.

My advice for you is to quit trying to be funny.

You're really bad at it.  Almost as bad as your god is.......


Now I'll put you back on IGNORE where all ignorant Trump Trolls belong..... especially the ones like you who prevaricate....

 

[libertybele]

No, it hasn't been answered, and specifically it hasn't been answered by you.

My advice for the future is take smaller bites and chew slowly.

???? My two cents here ... Cruz's eligibility has nothing to do with this thread; please try to stay on topic.  Secondly, Music is correct; the discussion of Cruz's eligibility has been answered and debated numerous times inside and out.  He is no longer running for president and it is rather foolish and futile to try to attach any type of Trump liability to him especially when it is nothing more than pure adulterated b.s. 

Secondly, to try to 'corner' someone who has been a long term member of this forum is really barking up the wrong tree.  My advice for you in the future is to not open your mouth with your foot still in it.

Peace.

[Longmire]

Here's a hint:  as long as the news cycle is about Trump and his boneheaded gaffes, he's losing.

Trump controls the news cycle like a boss and when he doesn't like what they say he punches through them to reach the people directly.

Coffin Hillary will dig her own grave in due time, even the liberal media types you're so enamored of can't keep her hidden forever.

[ArneFufkin]

Trump's reactionary outburst is unfortunately a given at this point but if Jeff Flake was being courted by several Sunday morning shows then a lot of this conflict is his doing.   He's playing the useful idiot for the anti-Trump media.

[musiclady]

???? My two cents here ... Cruz's eligibility has nothing to do with this thread; please try to stay on topic.  Secondly, Music is correct; the discussion of Cruz's eligibility has been answered and debated numerous times inside and out.  He is no longer running for president and it is rather foolish and futile to try to attach any type of Trump liability to him especially when it is nothing more than pure adulterated b.s. 

Secondly, to try to 'corner' someone who has been a long term member of this forum is really barking up the wrong tree.  My advice for you in the future is to not open your mouth with your foot still in it.

Peace.

Beautiful!

Thanks, libertybele! Well done!   

[driftdiver]

Trump controls the news cycle like a boss and when he doesn't like what they say he punches through them to reach the people directly.

Coffin Hillary will dig her own grave in due time, even the liberal media types you're so enamored of can't keep her hidden forever.

In due time?  The Clintons have been doing this for decades.

[Longmire]

???? My two cents here ... Cruz's eligibility has nothing to do with this thread;

I disagree.

Questioning Cruz's eligibility was one of Trump's earliest attacks on a Republican and it was quite effective in splitting off a large segment of conservative voters.

But I was responding to the assertion that Trump supporters don't know the Constitution, which strictly speaking isn't on topic either.

Perhaps you'd like to scold your friends up thread for creating that straw man.

[DCPatriot]

I disagree.

Questioning Cruz's eligibility was one of Trump's earliest attacks on a Republican and it was quite effective in splitting off a large segment of conservative voters.

But I was responding to the assertion that Trump supporters don't know the Constitution, which strictly speaking isn't on topic either.

Perhaps you'd like to scold your friends up thread for creating that straw man.

RE: bold...that's exactly right.   They impugned Trump supporters' knowledge of the Constitution. 

[sinkspur]

Trump controls the news cycle like a boss and when he doesn't like what they say he punches through them to reach the people directly.

Coffin Hillary will dig her own grave in due time, even the liberal media types you're so enamored of can't keep her hidden forever.

You can't see that Trump, by keeping the focus on himself, reinforces the negative views most voters have of him.  His unfavorables have never dropped below 60 since he's been nominated.

Yeah, he reaches the people directly and most of them don't like what they see. 

You can hope this turns around, but the odds are very long it won't.  Trump doesn't lead in a single battleground state and hasn't this entire campaign. 

[sinkspur]

I disagree.

Questioning Cruz's eligibility was one of Trump's earliest attacks on a Republican and it was quite effective in splitting off a large segment of conservative voters.

But I was responding to the assertion that Trump supporters don't know the Constitution, which strictly speaking isn't on topic either.

Perhaps you'd like to scold your friends up thread for creating that straw man.

No. It was effective in splitting off the dumbassed voters.  Not a single court (and there were four) ruled in favor of those who challenged Cruz's eligibility.

Like Trump's disputing of  Obama's legitimacy, the only people who bought Trump's garbage were the numb-nutted conspiracy geeks.

[kjam22]

You can't see that Trump, by keeping the focus on himself, reinforces the negative views most voters have of him.  His unfavorables have never dropped below 60 since he's been nominated.

Yeah, he reaches the people directly and most of them don't like what they see. 

You can hope this turns around, but the odds are very long it won't.  Trump doesn't lead in a single battleground state and hasn't this entire campaign. 

Yep,  this election is over and the King Trumpy worshipers are to stupid to know it

[Smokin Joe]

No, it hasn't been answered, and specifically it hasn't been answered by you.

My advice for the future is take smaller bites and chew slowly.

What, do you want everyone to line up and answer the question? one at a time? Is this a quiz? Who made you the arbiter of who can post unmolested? Really, pull your head out of your hat and quit acting like you sat in it.

[Smokin Joe]

RE: bold...that's exactly right.   They impugned Trump supporters' knowledge of the Constitution.

And I'll do it again, right here, so people don't have to look for it. How in the dickens can you claim he knows the Constitution (all twelve articles of it he said he'd uphold) when there are only seven articles, ten Amendments in the Bill of Rights, and 27 Amendments total.

 It is a gaffe on the level of Obama's '57 states' gaffe, only we can see where Obama got 57 states (in the Caliphate).

The number 12 doesn't fit in the Constitution. I figure if y'all were knowledgeable about the Constitution on so much as a statistical level, that might have tripped a flag with you, too.

[Vulcan]

No. It was effective in splitting off the dumbassed voters.  Not a single court (and there were four) ruled in favor of those who challenged Cruz's eligibility.

Like Trump's disputing of  Obama's legitimacy, the only people who bought Trump's garbage were the numb-nutted conspiracy geeks.