Trump hires the B team

[Bigun]

Do they not know how obvious they've become?  That if (if only) they had their way....they would summarily censor and edit any and every thread that didn't meet with their criteria of "acceptable"....just like at TOS.  That is, in all of it's glory.... facism (oh crap...I said the "F word".  Now I've done it!).

This has been repeatedly proven true!

[XenaLee]

Got to keep chumming the hate.

Hillary Clinton thanks them all, in that insincere and robotic manner of hers.

So....let's be clear here.  You are accusing Myst of "chumming the hate".  Merely for posting a factual article about Trump's lack of campaign staff, competent or otherwise. 

Got it.

[musiclady]

So....let's be clear here.  You are accusing Myst of "chumming the hate".  Merely for posting a factual article about Trump's lack of campaign staff, competent or otherwise. 

Got it.

Yeah.............. and we all know how hateful and unfair Myst is........    Oy.   


(Sometimes when you think like a robot and just regurgitate what you're told, you don't realize how utterly stupid you look to people who still can think).

[Right_in_Virginia]

Got to keep chumming the hate.

Hillary Clinton thanks them all, in that insincere and robotic manner of hers.

It does appear there is no longer a limit here to the help provided to Hillary.  I just can't understand why that is.   

[Right_in_Virginia]

(Sometimes when you think like a robot and just regurgitate what you're told, you don't realize how utterly stupid you look to people who still can think).

This is a good lesson for everyone to learn.   

[Bigun]

It does appear there is no longer a limit here to the help provided to Hillary.  I just can't understand why that is.   

The only ones helping Hillary around here are Donald Trump and his supporters!

[ABX]

It does appear there is no longer a limit here to the help provided to Hillary.  I just can't understand why that is.   

It is an elementary school error to continue to use a false dichotomy- and frankly, it reeks of desperate manipulation. Calling out corruption is calling out corruption, no matter what letter is behind the name at the time. I should point out we have an entire section dedicated to Hillary scandals (Scandal Watch).

Turning a blind eye to Trump's failures/scandals/liberalism/corruption would make this place cult like (like a certain other site that demands strict orthodoxy and never a bad word be said about their savior). Here, it is about the principle, not the person. That's what makes us unique.

[XenaLee]

It is an elementary school error to continue to use a false dichotomy- and frankly, it reeks of desperate manipulation. Calling out corruption is calling out corruption, no matter what letter is behind the name at the time. I should point out we have an entire section dedicated to Hillary scandals (Scandal Watch).

Turning a blind eye to Trump's failures/scandals/liberalism/corruption would make this place cult like (like a certain other site that demands strict orthodoxy and never a bad word be said about their savior). Here, it is about the principle, not the person. That's what makes us unique.

 

[XenaLee]

It does appear there is no longer a limit here to the help provided to Hillary.  I just can't understand why that is.   

Just a casual observation.....but....

there's obviously a lot of things that you just can't understand.   

[XenaLee]

The only ones helping Hillary around here are Donald Trump and his supporters!

And funny....I could have sworn that I saw something a while back about it being against the rules for the Trump side to accuse the non-Trump side of "helping Hillary".  Did I imagine it?   

[r9etb]

And funny....I could have sworn that I saw something a while back about it being against the rules for the Trump side to accuse the non-Trump side of "helping Hillary". 

It was sarcasm.

[ABX]

And funny....I could have sworn that I saw something a while back about it being against the rules for the Trump side to accuse the non-Trump side of "helping Hillary".  Did I imagine it?   

Nope, you are correct. Many on both sides have been told not to accuse Trump supporters or Never Trumpers of actually supporting Hillary.  (that doesn't mean you can't accuse the candidates of that, just not actual members.)

[Wingnut]

It does appear there is no longer a limit here to the help provided to Hillary.  I just can't understand why that is.   

If you really want to defeat Hillary. Urge Trump to step down NOW.

[aligncare]

If you really want to defeat Hillary. Urge Trump to step down NOW.

Laughable.

[Just_Victor]

Laughable.

Indeed.  Trump is just getting wound-up.  Wait'll he really starts trying to lose the election.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Just a casual observation.....but....

there's obviously a lot of things that you just can't understand.   

@XenaLee

Maybe you could put down the sarcasm for a moment and explain this to me:  If you, and so many on this forum, are #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary, why is no one interested in threads that question (with evidence) Hillary's corruption and globalist masters?

If the folks here are really #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary .... and have no dog in the fight between Donald and Hillary . . . . where is the outpouring of promotion and support for a third candidate on this forum?

Why do you and so many here who are Never-Squared choose to trash the man Donald Trump---and his candidacy --- and leave Hillary Clinton standing and intact?

Explain this to me.  I admit --- I do not understand it.

[r9etb]

@XenaLee
Explain this to me.  I admit --- I do not understand it.

Oooooh, nice bit of passive-aggressive there. 

[ABX]

@XenaLee

.....why is no one interested in threads that question (with evidence) Hillary's corruption and globalist masters?......

As I pointed out above, we have an entire section dedicated to it...
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/board,71.0.html

And that doesn't even count all the topics on the subject placed in the Politics and National News sections as well.

But to use your question, now that I'm glancing at that topic- why aren't you interested in Hillary's corruption and globalist masters as I've seen you haven't posted a topic in that category nor have you posted more than one or two topics directly about Hillary in a month's time frame-  your percentage of posts about Trump are higher than those you complain about.
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;sa=topics;u=77

Physician heal thyself.

[XenaLee]

@XenaLee

Maybe you could put down the sarcasm for a moment and explain this to me:   If you, and so many on this forum, are #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary, why is no one interested in threads that question (with evidence) Hillary's corruption and globalist masters?

Why?  I thought you Trump-supporters loved sarcasm?  You'd have to ....since you excuse his every gaffe as either sarcasm, a joke or "just a suggestion"...lol.

I already fully know about Hillary's corruption.  At this point of our demise, it's a constant in the universe.  And why must you try so hard to get people to focus away from Trump?  Something you're concerned about?

And as for Hillary's "globalist masters"....they're the exact same masters that Trump pays homage to.  Soros comes immediately to mind.  Putin is another.  The ties.....the ties.....the ties that bind Trump to that same corruption....tsk tsk.

If the folks here are really #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary .... and have no dog in the fight between Donald and Hillary . . . . where is the outpouring of promotion and support for a third candidate on this forum?

I have already posted links and evidence of my support for a third candidate and party here.  Perhaps you missed it.  And I can't and don't presume to speak for others, only for myself. 

Why do you and so many here who are Never-Squared choose to trash the man Donald Trump---and his candidacy --- and leave Hillary Clinton standing and intact?

You're not paying attention.  But I knew that.  I trash Hillary (and Obama, and the Democrats) all the time.  It's a given.  But you're not really concerned with that, are you.  You're merely deflecting attention away (or trying to) ....as usual.....from The Don.  Again, concerned much?

Explain this to me.  I admit --- I do not understand it.

And I don't understand you and your penchant for censoring anything and everything that doesn't line up with your own personal views.  You jump into any thread that sheds negative light on Trump like it's your personal playground and like you're ticked that somebody has the audacity to speak with anything but glowing admiration towards "The Don".

I guess we're at an impasse here then.  And I, personally, would like to keep it that way.  The day I start understanding how you 'think' is the day I might consider hari kari.

JS.....

[truth_seeker]

Nope, you are correct. Many on both sides have been told not to accuse Trump supporters or Never Trumpers of actually supporting Hillary.  (that doesn't mean you can't accuse the candidates of that, just not actual members.)

And many times over, there have been directions to cut the crap about Hitler, Nazis, fascism etc. But I have seem little-to no enforcement of that, as the modding has become more and more one sided, and Trump supporters drift away in disgust.

[r9etb]

... and Trump supporters drift away in disgust.

Trying to see the downside....

[libertybele]

I've mentioned this on another thread but it is just as relevant here. Trump has NO Ground Game, and it is HE that is handing over the election to Hillary.

The Democrats have historically been better than Republicans with their "get out to vote" drives, hitting the women voters, minorities and  low income demographics as well who are less driven to leave their homes and vote in an election, even offering rides, cigarettes and phones. Democrats excel in the door belling. The Clinton's are experts at it.
But Trump?   His team has yet to leave the starting gate with TV ads, falling way way behind Hillary in TV ad spending, and the get out to vote campaign is non existent. They would rather rely on social media and flash  those pictures of event centers filled to capacity and say, "see how many people love Trump, how can he not win?"   Yet the 13 million who voted for him in the primary falls far short of the 65 million (minimum) needed to win the majority.
 He is in big trouble if he doesn't change game plans and do it now. Right-In-Virginia, that's why this thread. If you want to stick our head in the sand and  ignore the warning and not take this back to the trump campaign, that is your problem, not ours.     

  It is blatantly clear that Trump never had a ground game other than to hand the White House to Hillary.  Everything else is just smoke and mirrors alongside his horse and pony show. 

[Wingnut]

Trying to see the downside....

They have TOS.  But the clubhouse is getting smaller and someone needs to open up the window, let some air into the room I think I'm almost chokin' from the smell of stale perfume

[Just_Victor]

Trying to see the downside....

I know I don't want to drive anyone away.  If that means refraining from references to Nazis etc, then I'm happy to comply.  The last thing I want is for TBR to become the #nevertrump version of TOS.

Having said that some substance to the debate from the Trump supporters as detailed above would be appreciated.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Nope, you are correct. Many on both sides have been told not to accuse Trump supporters or Never Trumpers of actually supporting Hillary.  (that doesn't mean you can't accuse the candidates of that, just not actual members.) 

Well, @AbaraXas -- is it permitted to discuss how certain actions result in helping the Clinton campaign?  Would not the #NeverTrumps who absolutely, positively, right hand to God do not support Hillary Clinton for President prefer to know this? 

Wouldn't they prefer to be aware of a cause and affect they may be missing--especially if what they're missing helps a candidate they absolutely, positively, right hand to God do not support?

Why would this discussion cause such fear and anxiety that it is declared "against the rules" of this Forum?