Here is that 5% of the population rule we hear about, if you get 5% or more of the population as Muslim, chances are you will get strife because of a radicalized segment. This can't be repeated enough.
Why France? It's in the Math
http://www.aina.org/guesteds/20160718201544.htm
With Muslim communities typically containing within themselves the dangerous radical fringe, it is little wonder that as Muslim minorities grow in the West, a radical Islamist fringe will similarly grow in those Western locations. Some Western countries are a lot further down the road in hosting the growing Islamic presence, but none more so than France. That country's hospitality to North African migrants was facilitated by a sense of guilt felt by the French liberal elite in the wake of the Algerian Civil War and France's colonial history in North Africa. Hence North Africans flocked to France in the last decades of the 20th century, with the result that today the French Muslim community constitutes around 10% of the population, equal to around 6 million people. By contrast, the smaller Muslim communities of other European countries are still playing catch-up. Muslims represent 6% in the Netherlands, a rapidly growing 4% in Germany, 3% in Britain and 2.5% in Spain.
So if we apply the 5% jihadi rule, that means that French hospitality has resulted in approximately 300,000 Muslims in France today being in clear sympathy with the terror strikes in Paris, Nice and elsewhere. In such circumstances, it is surprising that there have not in fact been more strikes, and this is probably testimony to the efficiency of the French security services. However, there will be more. France is at a crossroads and its ruling elites need to take some very hard decisions if this situation is not to spiral out of control, leading to eventual civil conflict.
At the same time, other Western nations should be asking hard questions of their own immigration policies. If Muslim immigration means significant growth of radical jihadi sentiment, do immigration policies need to be reviewed to favour those communities who are more likely to contribute to social cohesion, rather than fragmentation? Do the political elites of Western countries have the courage to address such questions? Only time will tell, but time is of the essence.
People don't want to fool around with this rubbish.
