Bill Clinton: Email Classification Issues Are ‘Too Complicated To Explain To People’ [VIDEO]

[unknown]

Bill Clinton: Email Classification Issues Are ‘Too Complicated To Explain To People’ [VIDEO]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/12/bill-clinton-email-classification-issues-are-too-complicated-to-explain-to-people-video/

Chuck Ross
10:17 PM 08/12/2016

The American public doesn’t understand that Hillary Clinton is telling the truth about her classified emails because government classification issues are “too complicated to explain to people,” Bill Clinton said Friday.

The former president was speaking in Las Vegas a presidential forum hosted by the Asian American Journalists Association when he was asked why his wife lied about her emails.

“This is the biggest load of bull I’ve ever heard,” Clinton said during a lengthy response to the question.

He also threw two government officials — FBI director James Comey and Sec. of State John Kerry — under the bus while defending Hillary.

{ .. snip .. }

[GtHawk]

Good old Bill, such a low opinion of Americans. I remember when he reneged on a promise of tax rebates because Americans would be too stupid to spend the money wisely.

[unknown]

Good old Bill, such a low opinion of Americans. I remember when he reneged on a promise of tax rebates because Americans would be too stupid to spend the money wisely.

Me too, that was classic leftist liberal position. I couldn't believe that he actually would say that and then act on it.

[unknown]

Hillary: We'll take your money for 'common good'

http://www.wnd.com/2004/06/25332/

"“We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you."
“We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

[dfwgator]

Me too, that was classic leftist liberal position. I couldn't believe that he actually would say that and then act on it.

Well the fact Americans elected Obama twice, I'd say that Bill is onto something.

[GtHawk]

Well the fact Americans elected Obama twice, I'd say that Bill is onto something.

Maybe, but in 2016 will that be that the American people are stupid enough to to elect Hillary ot The Donald? Being a lifelong Californian I have seen that there is no limit to the stupidity of some people, moonbeam is one example, then the there was the governator, you remember, he was the predecessor to the trumpinator.

[PoloSec]

The Clinton's have always considered the American people too stupid and they make no bones about saying so, unfortunately it works for them and the entire progressive liberal democrat socialist party and their republican counter part whole heartily agree with them, hence we now have the progressive liberal democrat/Rino socialist uni-party increasingly taking our former republic for all it is worth and dividing the power amongst themselves with democrats getting the largest share as they are the designers of stolen power and its accompanying corruption mechanisms that insure their retention of wealth and power.

We did have one stand alone challenger to the savage beast but they collectively worked together to destroy his prospects and install one easily manipulated in such a manner that guarantee's their continued success.

A most pathetic condition we now find our beloved republic in, when the blame for all this nonsense is reduced to the lowest common denominator the finger of blame falls squarely upon those ultimately responsible for the maintenance and care of our constitutional republic... We The People... what shame to live the generation that let it all slip away through decades of apathy and neglect.

Is it too late to do something about it; I don't know but what I see is the streets full of the riotous give me more welfare attention seekers and getting what they want while those who want to see the restoration of our constitutional republic and stop the desecration sit in internet forums wondering why no one hears them; and yes I am guilty for I am here. 
My question is why do we not take the streets back, do they not belong to we the people, why as constitutional conservatives facing the death of our republic do we find sit and watch passivity so endearing?

[unknown]

The Clinton's have always considered the American people too stupid and they make no bones about saying so, unfortunately it works for them and the entire progressive liberal democrat socialist party and their republican counter part whole heartily agree with them, hence we now have the progressive liberal democrat/Rino socialist uni-party increasingly taking our former republic for all it is worth and dividing the power amongst themselves with democrats getting the largest share as they are the designers of stolen power and its accompanying corruption mechanisms that insure their retention of wealth and power.

We did have one stand alone challenger to the savage beast but they collectively worked together to destroy his prospects and install one easily manipulated in such a manner that guarantee's their continued success.

A most pathetic condition we now find our beloved republic in, when the blame for all this nonsense is reduced to the lowest common denominator the finger of blame falls squarely upon those ultimately responsible for the maintenance and care of our constitutional republic... We The People... what shame to live the generation that let it all slip away through decades of apathy and neglect.

Is it too late to do something about it; I don't know but what I see is the streets full of the riotous give me more welfare attention seekers and getting what they want while those who want to see the restoration of our constitutional republic and stop the desecration sit in internet forums wondering why no one hears them; and yes I am guilty for I am here. 
My question is why do we not take the streets back, do they not belong to we the people, why as constitutional conservatives facing the death of our republic do we find sit and watch passivity so endearing?

There was a time in this country when only property owners could vote. The reason was that if a person did not have the diligence and mental faculties to own property, then they were not ready to vote - maybe they were freeloaders, and would only vote for politicians that would give them free phones, etc.