Author Topic: Donald Trump to Propose Tax Breaks on ‘Pocketbook’ Issues in Economic Plan  (Read 494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-to-propose-tax-breaks-on-pocketbook-issues-in-economic-plan-1470663478

Donald Trump to Propose Tax Breaks on ‘Pocketbook’ Issues in Economic Plan

By NICK TIMIRAOS

Aug. 8, 2016 9:37 a.m. ET

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will outline Monday in an economic policy speech a proposal to allow families to deduct child-care spending from their income taxes as part of a broader effort to slash taxes, according to an adviser familiar with the plan.

It isn’t clear whether Monday’s speech will include details on how such a tax break might be structured and whether it would be available to families that don't pay income taxes.

So far, Mr. Trump’s economic policy message has focused primarily on placing greater curbs on trade and immigration, coupled with a large tax cut. The campaign’s economic message has promised to boost job growth but has included fewer appeals to voters on pocketbook issues such as child care and college tuition, a focus of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Trump is also set to call for a temporary moratorium on all new regulations from federal agencies and would seek to roll back rules that reduce employment. The campaign adviser said that review could target a series of environmental rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to curb carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and to bring more waterways and wetlands under federal protection.

At the same time, Mr. Trump has promised to aggressively use executive power to renegotiate trade agreements, to label foreign countries as currency manipulators and to apply tariffs and other penalties to trading partners.


Mr. Trump has also outlined a tax-cut plan that would sharply lower income-tax rates on individuals and businesses. The Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, has said the plan would reduce federal revenue by $9.5 trillion over a decade, making it far larger than the tax cuts enacted last decade by President George W. Bush.

The GOP nominee has also called for a big increase in infrastructure spending that would be financed by taking on new debt, but he hasn’t fleshed out details of that plan.

Budget experts say that even with a boost in economic growth, the combination of higher government spending on infrastructure—as well as other priorities that include a veterans’ health-care expansion and a ramp-up in border security—and large tax cuts could send deficits soaring.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Len Burman ‏@lenburman  43m43 minutes ago
Trump to propose deductible child care, which would do nothing for 110 million households who pay no income tax under his plan.

Larry Levitt ‏@larry_levitt  25m25 minutes ago
As with childcare, Trump proposed making health insurance premiums deductible. Does little to help the uninsured.

James Pethokoukis ‏@JimPethokoukis  51m51 minutes ago
@DouthatNYT So a childcare plan that helps Ivanka, and an estate tax plan that helps Ivanka?
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
I see former Michigan Governor William Milliken (R) endorsed Clinton this morning.

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,288
  • Gender: Male
One of the biggest disappointments and worries of this election is the refusal of the two candidates to even acknowledge or seriously address our rising deficits and debt. Not only that, but no serious so called entitlement reforms.

In short, both seem to be in a race who can be the better Santa 

It's still the spending, stupid
« Last Edit: August 08, 2016, 03:53:14 pm by LMAO »
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,384
  • Gender: Male
One of the biggest disappointments and worries of this election is the refusal of the two candidates to even acknowledge or seriously address our rising deficits and debt. Not only that, but no serious so called entitlement reforms.

In short, both seem to be in a race who can be the better Santa 

It's still the spending, stupid

Yep, I agree.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
One of the biggest disappointments and worries of this election is the refusal of the two candidates to even acknowledge or seriously address our rising deficits and debt. Not only that, but no serious so called entitlement reforms.

In short, both seem to be in a race who can be the better Santa 

It's still the spending, stupid

Yup.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-to-propose-tax-breaks-on-pocketbook-issues-in-economic-plan-1470663478

Donald Trump to Propose Tax Breaks on ‘Pocketbook’ Issues in Economic Plan

By NICK TIMIRAOS

Aug. 8, 2016 9:37 a.m. ET

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will outline Monday in an economic policy speech a proposal to allow families to deduct child-care spending from their income taxes as part of a broader effort to slash taxes, according to an adviser familiar with the plan.

It isn’t clear whether Monday’s speech will include details on how such a tax break might be structured and whether it would be available to families that don't pay income taxes.

So far, Mr. Trump’s economic policy message has focused primarily on placing greater curbs on trade and immigration, coupled with a large tax cut. The campaign’s economic message has promised to boost job growth but has included fewer appeals to voters on pocketbook issues such as child care and college tuition, a focus of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Trump is also set to call for a temporary moratorium on all new regulations from federal agencies and would seek to roll back rules that reduce employment. The campaign adviser said that review could target a series of environmental rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to curb carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and to bring more waterways and wetlands under federal protection.

At the same time, Mr. Trump has promised to aggressively use executive power to renegotiate trade agreements, to label foreign countries as currency manipulators and to apply tariffs and other penalties to trading partners.


Mr. Trump has also outlined a tax-cut plan that would sharply lower income-tax rates on individuals and businesses. The Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, has said the plan would reduce federal revenue by $9.5 trillion over a decade, making it far larger than the tax cuts enacted last decade by President George W. Bush.

The GOP nominee has also called for a big increase in infrastructure spending that would be financed by taking on new debt, but he hasn’t fleshed out details of that plan.

Budget experts say that even with a boost in economic growth, the combination of higher government spending on infrastructure—as well as other priorities that include a veterans’ health-care expansion and a ramp-up in border security—and large tax cuts could send deficits soaring.

Pardon my translation and interpretation of Trumpspeak.....but in MY book of logic.....

this translates to "targeted tax cuts"....yet another liberal leftie SOP move.  Color me not surprised.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,384
  • Gender: Male
Pardon my translation and interpretation of Trumpspeak.....but in MY book of logic.....

this translates to "targeted tax cuts"....yet another liberal leftie SOP move.  Color me not surprised.

Yep.

Social engineering through the Tax code.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Len Burman ‏@lenburman  43m43 minutes ago
Trump to propose deductible child care, which would do nothing for 110 million households who pay no income tax under his plan.

Larry Levitt ‏@larry_levitt  25m25 minutes ago
As with childcare, Trump proposed making health insurance premiums deductible. Does little to help the uninsured.
James Pethokoukis ‏@JimPethokoukis  51m51 minutes ago
@DouthatNYT So a childcare plan that helps Ivanka, and an estate tax plan that helps Ivanka?

Correct me if I'm wrong....but.....

making health insurance premiums deductible is only helpful to people that itemize deductions...right?  It's like that BS they tell folks about donating their car and that it's tax deductible.  It's not tax deductible for everyone, of course.   So tell me, Trump supporters.... how the hell does that help the lower middle class workers that generally do not have enough deductions to itemize? 
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Yep.

Social engineering through the Tax code.

Marxist (communist) redistribution of wealth.  And it's ongoing in AmeriKa as we speak.

My only question is....

why the hell are we allowing them to do this???
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,285
Len Burman ‏@lenburman  43m43 minutes ago
Trump to propose deductible child care, which would do nothing for 110 million households who pay no income tax under his plan.

And therein lies the problem.  Everyone earning income should be paying income taxes.  Everyone.

The statement above reveals that there are 110 million households that will vote for any tax increase because it doesn't affect them, and any spending increase that benefits them.  Taxpayers are now a slave class to those that pay no taxes.  We need more people on the tax rolls, not less.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

geronl

  • Guest
I remember him dropping the idea for the biggest tax cuts evah! Now he's back to tax cuts? weird.