If ONE third-party candidate could win ONE state's electors, there's a possibility that neither Trump nor Hillary would win the majority of electoral votes to win, and the House would pick a President.
The only problem with that is that only the three top candidates would be on the House ballot, and there is no viable and sane third party this year.
Missed opportunity for the Libertarians.
Yeah, it was. But I'm convinced they don't want to win elections - they want to MOCK them.
ONLY in a case of complete national fragmentation will a third party win anything. Last time it happened was when the abolitionist third-party, the Republicans, ran that geeky beanpole railroad lawyer from Illinois for President. And even within a third-party, Lincoln was the convention's stalking-horse. William Seward was the one going in with the most support.
Had the South not seceded, the Democrats would have won and the Whigs struggled on a few more years.
THIS year is the closest to that scenario we've seen in modern times. And this year, with TWO miserable Major-Party candidates, the Libertarians could have run a reasonable man on a reasonable platform - and SWEPT it.
But that's not their aim. Their aim is to be the political Monty Python.