Author Topic: Gingrich: New York Times, Washington Post in 'all-out war' against Trump  (Read 1387 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mechanicos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,350
Gingrich: New York Times, Washington Post in 'all-out war' against Trump

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) said in an interview broadcast Sunday that two of the country’s most prominent newspapers are in an “all-out war” against Donald Trump.

During a radio interview with John Catsimatidis, Gingrich blasted the news outlets, saying they are lying about the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

“Both The New York Times and The Washington Post have been in an all-out war to try to redefine Donald Trump,” he said.

Gingrich pointed to a Times article that portrayed Trump as often being inappropriate with women. The report relied on testimony from dozens of women who have interacted with the mogul over the years.

Gingrich said that “every single woman in the article [repudiated] the article, and say that The New York Times lied. They didn’t say those things.”

Rowanne Brewer Lane, who dated Trump, said the Times had taken a quote from her out of context.

Gingrich, who is reportedly one of Trump’s top choices for vice president, also argued that it’s clear Trump is a better choice than presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

“If you think that it's OK to have a corrupt, dishonest government in Washington, Hillary Clinton is the perfect candidate, because she’s part of the establishment, she gets it, she understands how to lie about virtually everything,” Gingrich said.

“If you really believe we got to change America back to prosperity and jobs and creativity and dynamics, then Trump is the only candidate in this race that makes any sense at all,” he added later

[More]

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/286379-gingrich-new-york-times-washington-post-in-all-out-war
Trump is for America First.
"Crooked Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of the Status Quo – and wherever Hillary Clinton goes, corruption and scandal follow." D. Trump 7/11/16

Did you know that the word ‘gullible’ is not in the dictionary?

Isaiah 54:17

Offline Gov Bean Counter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,483
Suck it up, buttercup.
Donald Trump - Simple solutions for the simple minded...

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Gingrich has sold his soul for a little time in the limelight. When Trump loses, Gingrich's political life will be finished.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

geronl

  • Guest
Trump has made several statements where he calls for action against the first amendment, even shutting down parts of the internet. He says those who cry for free speech are foolish.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,075
Quote
New York Times, Washington Post in 'all-out war' against Trump

Funny how they weren't in an all out war until AFTER Trump became the nominee.  Before that, both media outlets provided millions of dollars of free press and advertising to help Trump win the nomination.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,075
As for Noot, he also thinks that FDR was our greatest President.  'Nuff said.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
As for Noot, he also thinks that FDR was our greatest President.  'Nuff said.

Good ole 40 year insider reach across the aisle Noot.



Any respect I had for him evaporated in 2012 with his attempt to sell amnesty with a plan to give illegals some sort of legal but non voting status. The supreme court would have given those legal residents full citizenship inside a year. Then there was his plan to replace the EPA with another "free market" version of the same.

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,808
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Hmmmm.......
Lemmmmeeeeesssseeee here.....

New York Times? Check.
Washington Post? Check.

When you're taking all the flak, you must be.....?

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,240
Hmmmm.......
Lemmmmeeeeesssseeee here.....

New York Times? Check.
Washington Post? Check.

When you're taking all the flak, you must be.....?

Yup @Fishrrman   :thumbsup3:

Offline WAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
Gingrich has sold his soul for a little time in the limelight. When Trump loses, Gingrich's political life will be finished.

Newt's exactly what Trump needs either as VP, or Chief of staff as some have suggested. To say that Newt's political life is finished is ridiculous....he will always be consulted and sought after as he is today. The man is a "doer" and knows how to get things thru Congress where it's always favorable to our side....he knows how the players play to be sure and would do Trump a huge service by being on his team.....

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,240
Newt's exactly what Trump needs either as VP, or Chief of staff as some have suggested. To say that Newt's political life is finished is ridiculous....he will always be consulted and sought after as he is today. The man is a "doer" and knows how to get things thru Congress where it's always favorable to our side....he knows how the players play to be sure and would do Trump a huge service by being on his team.....

I'd love to see Newt serve as President Trump's Chief of Staff .... and train a small band of mini-Newts as he throws a lasso around Congress!   ^-^

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Newt's exactly what Trump needs either as VP, or Chief of staff as some have suggested. To say that Newt's political life is finished is ridiculous....he will always be consulted and sought after as he is today. The man is a "doer" and knows how to get things thru Congress where it's always favorable to our side....he knows how the players play to be sure and would do Trump a huge service by being on his team.....

Newt hasn't gotten anything through Congress in 18 years.  He's not consulted by anyone, so far as I know.  He's 73 and pretends that he's still a player. 

He's not. But he's certainly a "yes" man to Trump, so I can see why Trump would turn to him.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
I'd love to see Newt serve as President Trump's Chief of Staff .... and train a small band of mini-Newts as he throws a lasso around Congress!   ^-^

That's funny.  Congress is running away from Trump as fast as its members can.  You think they'll work with Newt or Trump?
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Online kevindavis007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,458
  • Gender: Male
Join The Reagan Caucus: https://reagancaucus.org/ and the Eisenhower Caucus: https://EisenhowerCaucus.org

Ronald Reagan: “Rather than...talking about putting up a fence, why don’t we work out some recognition of our mutual problems and make it possible for them to come here legally with a work permit…earning here they pay taxes here.”

Offline WAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
Funny how they weren't in an all out war until AFTER Trump became the nominee.  Before that, both media outlets provided millions of dollars of free press and advertising to help Trump win the nomination.
Well Hillary wasn't in play then, the other candidates were.....the general is a whole nother story in itself... and we know the media will be in Hillary's court.....they always have favored Demorats but Hillary is their 'Queenie' they want her ready for her Coronation ....(God please NO!)


Offline WAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
Newt hasn't gotten anything through Congress in 18 years.  He's not consulted by anyone, so far as I know.  He's 73 and pretends that he's still a player.  ....He's not. But he's certainly a "yes" man to Trump, so I can see why Trump would turn to him.

Well that's probably true..."as far as you know"....but others are certainly aware otherwise.

And of course he's still a player....he's being considered as a VP to Trump ...that IS one IN play.

All Pre-nominees will always look for Loyalty, at this point in the race especially....but there's no way Newt's a yes man to Trump and Trump knows that.

Oceander

  • Guest
Gee, go figure.  Even a stopped clock gets the time right twice a day. 

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
The media is going to go after Trump with never before seen vigor was one of the warnings we gave early on.

The man is pulling a trainload of ammo that will be used against him from his 30+ years of celebrity.

We ain't seen nuthin yet. :shrug:

Offline WAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
That's funny.  Congress is running away from Trump as fast as its members can.  You think they'll work with Newt or Trump?

No they aren't....it's not time to endorse Trump for President until convention and thereafter....many will watch to see how Trump does and will begin to fall in line with him when it's the most advantageous to their own seats. But 'because he is an outsider', and this election as been all but the standard I suspect others will take their time...

But look as of May 27th...of the Senate:

There are '6' six Senators who have 'endorsed' Trump...
Then after May 4, the day Trump became the party's presumptive nominee '30' Senators announced their support of Trump.

Of the  House Republicans:

There are '27' who have  'endorsed' Trump .
Then after May 4, the day Trump became the party's presumptive nominee '124'  House Members announced their support of Trump.
There are only 57 who won't say at this time if they will or not support Trump who are waiting to see how Trump does.

The names are listed here:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/full-list-where-every-republican-in-congress-stands-on-donald-trump/article/2592510


Offline WAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
The media is going to go after Trump with never before seen vigor was one of the warnings we gave early on.
The man is pulling a trainload of ammo that will be used against him from his 30+ years of celebrity.

No problem....Hillary's got years of 'political' corruption and  scandals to live down.. and worse  'done in office' by her and her husband....from day one.

But Cruz did warn us all that this would happen even if he wasn't the Nominee....few really needed anyone to warn us, we ALL knew very well that whoever the Nominee would be that 'the Clinton AND Obama Machines' would move hell itself to work for them to get Hillary in office and oppose whoever opposes her.....Remember Hildabeast has always "warned" everyone..."IT"S MY TURN!" 


Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
No they aren't....it's not time to endorse Trump for President until convention and thereafter....many will watch to see how Trump does and will begin to fall in line with him when it's the most advantageous to their own seats. But 'because he is an outsider', and this election as been all but the standard I suspect others will take their time...

But look as of May 27th...of the Senate:

There are '6' six Senators who have 'endorsed' Trump...
Then after May 4, the day Trump became the party's presumptive nominee '30' Senators announced their support of Trump.

Of the  House Republicans:

There are '27' who have  'endorsed' Trump .
Then after May 4, the day Trump became the party's presumptive nominee '124'  House Members announced their support of Trump.
There are only 57 who won't say at this time if they will or not support Trump who are waiting to see how Trump does.

The names are listed here:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/full-list-where-every-republican-in-congress-stands-on-donald-trump/article/2592510



"I support the nominee" is not the same thing as endorsing Trump.  And Senators like Cornyn have said they won't have another word to say until after the election.

Not exactly enthusiastic support there, either.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Online LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,141
  • Gender: Male
No problem....Hillary's got years of 'political' corruption and  scandals to live down.. and worse  'done in office' by her and her husband....from day one.

But Cruz did warn us all that this would happen even if he wasn't the Nominee....few really needed anyone to warn us, we ALL knew very well that whoever the Nominee would be that 'the Clinton AND Obama Machines' would move hell itself to work for them to get Hillary in office and oppose whoever opposes her.....Remember Hildabeast has always "warned" everyone..."IT"S MY TURN!" 



The NYT and Wash Post would do to any GOP nominee what they're doing to Trump.

Also, nobody should ever doubt Hillary's lust for power and her sense of entitlement.That makes her the most dangerous candidate to ever run for president. In her mind, all her scandals and corruption and incompetence should be overlooked because of all the good she does. Which, all this good she does is undefined because even her supporters can't name any accomplishments

No Hillary, you don't "deserve" to be POTUS
« Last Edit: July 05, 2016, 02:33:12 am by LMAO »
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

geronl

  • Guest
They're attacking the media again, what embarrassing thing did Trump do this time that requires distraction....

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,075
The media is going to go after Trump with never before seen vigor was one of the warnings we gave early on.

The man is pulling a trainload of ammo that will be used against him from his 30+ years of celebrity.

We ain't seen nuthin yet. :shrug:

Good to see you again, Cripplecreek.  Welcome to the Dexter Lake Club.  And your assessment is 100% accurate as usual.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Funny how they weren't in an all out war until AFTER Trump became the nominee.  Before that, both media outlets provided millions of dollars of free press and advertising to help Trump win the nomination.

And IIRC more than a few of us said that the MSM were waiting to see if Trump became the mominee to unload on him.

What's happened so far isn't even a drop in the bucket of what they have instore for Donny.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!