Palin Rips Never Trump Republicans: You Are Either With Us or Against Us"

[Suppressed]

Yet, In battle ground states where Hilary has spent tens of millions to Trump's zero Trump is tied or ahead of Hillary.

Yes, that illustrates how Hillary is a bad candidate who could have been easily beaten by a conservative if not for the Trump (i.e., Hillary) supporters.

[sneakypete]

Who knows, but after this election, I hope we learned about appointing people as the next 'savior' of the conservative cause..

Well,to be fair to the people that supported her at first,including me,she seemed like Barry Goldwater compared to McLunatic,and she did talk the talk. She eventually morphed into a prettier and slightly more feminine Boy Jorge Bush  after McLunatic kept slapping her down and apologizing for her conservative statements,though.

I guess it would be fair to say she started off as a conservative because that is what she believed in,but McLunatic and the RNC convinced her she needed to be a modern day Dim to be politically relevant,so she gave up her convictions for fame and fortune.

Yeah,it still makes her slightly less moral than a street whore because all a street whore sells is her physical self. Palin sold her soul.

[Henry Noel]

Yeah,it still makes her slightly less moral than a street whore because all a street whore sells is her physical self. Palin sold her soul.

Either one will leave you with a disease.

[Henry Noel]

I'm going out on a limb but I think she never had any values...

Children usually end up perpetuating their parents' values. Sometimes they undergo a short period of rebellion, but almost always go back to the values they learned by observing their parents over the course of a lengthy childhood.

[East of the Beast]

I never supported that bubble brain quitter.

[Right_in_Virginia]

@mlizzy. @Right_in_Virginia

Why would I join a movement so lacking in integrity, class, and American values?

I don't know ... please don't ask me to explain why you're participating in #NeverTrump.   

[driftdiver]

I don't know ... please don't ask me to explain why you're participating in #NeverTrump.   

Nice twist. 

[r9etb]

Who knows, but after this election, I hope we learned about appointing people as the next 'savior' of the conservative cause..

Yeah, but it's so much easier to rely upon an appointed savior, than to do the hard work ourselves.  (And I count myself among the sinners on the latter point.)

[Hoodat]

I used to be a Palin supporter.   Now I wonder if she ever had any values.  She's abandoned her young children for the limelight.

The part that baffle me the most is this: 
As the mother of a Down's child, how can she support someone who openly mocks handicapped people?

[Timber Rattler]

OK Sarah, I'm against you.  Now sit down and shut up.

[Silver Pines]

The part that baffle me the most is this: 
As the mother of a Down's child, how can she support someone who openly mocks handicapped people?

Wow, I never even considered that before, but you're right.  I'd love to hear her attempt at an explanation.

[Cyber Liberty]

How I feel about Trump is irrelevant, I'm against Palin.  Except the part where she makes me a sandwich, I'm OK with that.

[geronl]

Trump is the Anti-Reagan. .

He ran full-page newspaper ads against Reagan policies. He called Reagan a "con-man who didn't deliver the goods"....

[musiclady]

Wow, I never even considered that before, but you're right.  I'd love to hear her attempt at an explanation.

You know what she would say.  She'd say he was just pretending to be nervous, and then attack everyone who saw what he really was doing when he mocked a handicapped man.

IOW, she will lie to protect her hero and continue to be a mindless lackey defending the indefensible.

It's what they all do.

[geronl]

Dear Sally Parin,

You should have figured this out by now.

We Are Conservatives Against Trump - CATs- and yes, we are against Trump.

[Mechanicos]

Dear Sally Parin,

You should have figured this out by now.

We Are Conservatives Against Trump - CATs- and yes, we are against Trump.

In case you did not notice Conservatives are for Trump. Much more so then the ones who want to hurt the mean man regardless of the consequences to conservatism and America.

[uglybiker]

He ran full-page newspaper ads against Reagan policies. He called Reagan a "con-man who didn't deliver the goods"....

It'd be fun to post those ads somewhere just to throw it back in their faces.

[driftdiver]

In case you did not notice Conservatives are for Trump. Much more so then the ones who want to hurt the mean man regardless of the consequences to conservatism and America.

[INVAR]

In case you did not notice Conservatives are for Trump. Much more so then the ones who want to hurt the mean man regardless of the consequences to conservatism and America.

Then you have nothing to worry about from those of us who intend to hurt any chance Trump has of getting into the Office.

You people are the ones who created the consequences of rendering Conservatism irrelevant given your trashing of every Conservative in the race to push Trump as your prince.

Now you are busy redefining Conservatism into an image of Trump.

Real Conservatives actually know what real Conservatism looks and sounds like and your prince is no Conservative depite the fact you have put lipstick on your pig and paraded him in front of us as such.

[geronl]

It'd be fun to post those ads somewhere just to throw it back in their faces.

$100,000 in 1987 for this one

[driftdiver]

$100,000 in 1987 for this one

And here we've been told that Trump is the next Reagan.

[sneakypete]

In case you did not notice Conservatives are for Trump. Much more so then the ones who want to hurt the mean man regardless of the consequences to conservatism and America.

What color is the sky on your home world?

Did you ride Unicorns to school?

[sneakypete]

$100,000 in 1987 for this one

Ok,he is 100 percent on target with that one,and doesn't even take it far enough. Not only do we defend those people for free,but WE PAY THEM FOR THE "PRIVILEGE" by leasing/renting the land and ports where we have bases,and by paying them for any damages our preparedness operations cost in road damage,sign/traffic light removal and replacement,environmental damage clean-up,etc,etc,etc.

[Smokin Joe]

$100,000 in 1987 for this one

Do you have a link to that one? I can't see the image.

[geronl]

Ok,he is 100 percent on target with that one,and doesn't even take it far enough. Not only do we defend those people for free,but WE PAY THEM FOR THE "PRIVILEGE" by leasing/renting the land and ports where we have bases,and by paying them for any damages our preparedness operations cost in road damage,sign/traffic light removal and replacement,environmental damage clean-up,etc,etc,etc.

It was 1987, Reagan was retiring soon. Seems kind of pointless.