Exactly so. The Constitution is a contract between the states, the people, and the federal government. Anyone familiar with contracts knows that no one party to a contract may ignore portions of said contract or claim that the terms of the contract now mean something altogether different from what they meant when the contract was agreed to. A "living, breathing document" would be nothing more than a set of suggestions. That is decidedly not what the Constitution is.
I was watching some news program recently, and they had a Dem pol or operative on arguing that since the constitution was written more 200 years ago, it obviously wasn't up to date with today's changing culture and ways. He inferred that it was alright to ignore sections of the constitution that didn't agree with his party's agenda.
Oh really!!! Well, we've had laws against murder, arson, robbery for over 200 years as well. I guess they're not up to date with today's changing culture. So I surmise that that Dem idiot doesn't mind if I make my own laws allowing me to rob and/or murder him or his loved ones. I'd just be changing with the times. Why should we obey old laws?
We all know the Dems just want to obey the parts of the constitution that help them promote their sick agenda and ignore the ones that might prevent or alter their twisted plans.