Research university hides results of fracking study which fails to prove it’s dangerous

[Smokin Joe]

By Jazz Shaw

What happens when a university research department is tasked with conducting a study of the harmful effects of fracking on ground water and other environmental concerns? Well, that depends on who provides their research money and what the results turn out to be. In the case of the University of Cincinnati, a lot of their funding comes from groups which have a vested interest in proving how harmful fracking is so it’s hardly a surprise that they lost interest in the study when it failed to produce any evidence of ground water contamination near commercial fracking sites.

Jeff Stier, senior fellow and head of the Risk Analysis Division at the National Center for Public Policy Research in Washington provides a detailed report ...

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/04/26/research-university-hides-results-of-fracking-study-which-fails-to-prove-its-dangerous/

[Smokin Joe]

This information should have been in there somewhere:

posted at 5:01 pm on April 26, 2016 by Jazz Shaw

Sorry, it's my first post here of a new topic, I'll work on that.

[mystery-ak]

You did good Smokin....you can modify your posts here and insert what you missed in the original post.

[Smokin Joe]

You did good Smokin....you can modify your posts here and insert what you missed in the original post.

I like that feature! Thanks!

[thackney]

So once they showed Hydro Frac safe in their 3 year study, they hid their results.

New study and new funding to begin soon.. 

[IsailedawayfromFR]

By Jazz Shaw

What happens when a university research department is tasked with conducting a study of the harmful effects of fracking on ground water and other environmental concerns? Well, that depends on who provides their research money and what the results turn out to be. In the case of the University of Cincinnati, a lot of their funding comes from groups which have a vested interest in proving how harmful fracking is so it’s hardly a surprise that they lost interest in the study when it failed to produce any evidence of ground water contamination near commercial fracking sites.

Jeff Stier, senior fellow and head of the Risk Analysis Division at the National Center for Public Policy Research in Washington provides a detailed report ...

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/04/26/research-university-hides-results-of-fracking-study-which-fails-to-prove-its-dangerous/

Well, there is always good to be found:  This wasted some money from the environmental wackos to no cause.

I see you are a former Freeper now here, as am I, although under another handle.

[Smokin Joe]

Well, there is always good to be found:  This wasted some money from the environmental wackos to no cause.

I see you are a former Freeper now here, as am I, although under another handle.

I didn't get the zot, to my surprise. I prefer the more relaxed atmosphere here. <p>They did suck up some of the Ecowhacko funds, but unfortunately, that just means someone else will be sued to get more.

[rodamala]

So once they showed Hydro Frac safe in their 3 year study, they hid their results.

New study and new funding to begin soon..

New study, new funding... and a new batch of braindead precious snowflake grad students that will stick to the narrative.

[Bigun]

So once they showed Hydro Frac safe in their 3 year study, they hid their results.

New study and new funding to begin soon..

Well of course!