Author Topic: You Won’t Believe What Jon Stewart’s Protege Think Welfare Leeches Deserve Next  (Read 374 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
You Won’t Believe What Jon Stewart’s Protege Think Welfare Leeches Deserve Next

http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/jon-stewarts-protege

April 12, 2016| by V. Saxena

Personal responsibility revolves around one extremely simple principle: Behave yourself.

If you want to avoid incurring unnecessary suffering in your life, then refrain from committing crime or engaging in sexual immorality, among other things.

Simple, right?

Not according to Jon Stewart’s protege, Samantha Bee, an obnoxiously catty woman who believes that it rests on the state to pay for the diapers needed by low-income single parents.

Specifically, she wants the already overburdened Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to cover diapers in addition to lobster and shellfish.

And because Republicans rightfully oppose this, she feels angry — real angry (H/T NewsBusters):

Really?

It takes nothing but a few bucks for a woman to obtain birth control, but because we fiscally disciplined conservatives oppose subsidizing this luxury, we should therefore feel compelled to subsidize diapers instead?

Everyone in this country has the choice to either abstain from sexual activity or spend a few dollars to purchase some form of birth control.

Eleanor Roosevelt once remarked, “With freedom comes responsibility.”

And well, perhaps those people incapable of practicing this simple requirement — namely those whom Bee believes deserve to have every single one of their poor decisions subsidized — should have their freedom revoked?

With Freedom Comes Responsibility

PS: If that sounds utterly barking mad to you, then please realize that I purposefully chose to ask that question to point out how ridiculous Bee sounds.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2016, 03:49:26 pm by rangerrebew »

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Had you been around about the time of the founding of this country, if someone asked you the definition of freedom you would have probably responded responsibility.