Obama’s Security Clearance Overhaul Lands with a Thud Before Lawmakers
February 26, 2016
By Eric Katz
Government Executive
The plan, which tasks the Pentagon with safeguarding new investigations, appears to just be 'window dressing on a broken home.'
A bipartisan chorus of lawmakers on Thursday questioned the Obama administration’s creation of a new federal entity to conduct background investigations, criticizing the plan’s failure to make fundamental changes.
Eric Katz joined Government Executive in the summer of 2012 after graduating from The George Washington University, where he studied journalism and political science. He has written for his college newspaper and an online political news website and worked in a public affairs office for the Navy’s ... Full Bio
The phasing out of the Federal Investigative Service in favor of the new National Background Investigative Bureau appears to ignore some of the most fundamental problems with the security clearance system, members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said at a hearing to examine the plan. Administration officials defended the overhaul, saying it does signal a significant change and that it will provide more security for sensitive data.
“We want to make sure we’re not just putting a coat of fresh paint on a house with a bad foundation,” said Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla.
Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., echoed that concern, though he praised the administration’s decision to task the Defense Department with creating and maintaining a new information technology system in which the personnel data will be stored. Previously, he said, the Office of Personnel Management employed an “irrational system” in which a “human resources agency protected the nation’s most sensitive data.”
Still, Lieu voiced apprehension that the new plan may end up being “window dressing on a broken home.” Instead, he added, the system needs “significant renovation.”
If we’re setting up a new house, I want to make sure it’s not a house of cards.
OPM acting Director Beth Cobert attempted to assuage those concerns, saying NBIB’s creation will modernize the security clearance process, leverage Defense’s cybersecurity expertise, allow the president to nominate a director to oversee the background investigation system and boost operational flexibility. Aside from those broad brush strokes and emphasizing the Pentagon’s new role, however, Cobert did not lay out specifics of exactly how NBIB will differ from FIS.
The changes come after the dual concerns over both the screening process itself—which came to light after Edward Snowden’s document release and Aaron Alexis’ shooting of employees at the Washington Navy Yard—and the protection of personal data collected during investigations—which were hacked last year and compromised 21.5 million files containing personal information. The Obama administration and Congress have already taken several steps to shore up the security clearance process, but NBIB’s creation reflects the most dramatic overhaul of vetting and cybersecurity procedures to date.
Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., openly laughed at the officials attempting to sell NBIB as an improvement over the existing system.
“Folks, hang on to your shorts on this one,” Mica said. “I think we’re headed for another disaster.”
We’ll be back here in 2017. I guaran-damn-tee it.
Rep. John Mica, R-Fla.
Mica instead suggested background investigations be moved from OPM’s purview entirely, saying the checks should be contracted out “one bite at a time.” FIS already relies on contractors for a majority of background investigation efforts, as NBIB will continue to do.
Several lawmakers criticized the administration for requesting additional Defense funding to build out the new IT system. Obama asked for $95 million in his fiscal 2017 budget blueprint, which Russell said was “weakening our country.”
“We should find another way to pay for this,” Russell said. He also speculated that by breaking up the security responsibilities among different agencies, sensitive data was becoming more vulnerable.
Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, agreed.
“To grab this out of the troops’ budget is probably the last way to do that,” he said.
Cobert said she expects NBIB to be up and running by October with minimal disruption to the continuity of service. OPM will launch a transition team by mid-March to stand up NBIB and oversee the phase-out of FIS.
At least some lawmakers appeared to remain concerned.
“If we’re setting up a new house,” Russell said, “I want to make sure it’s not a house of cards.”
Mica predicted the new structure would indeed collapse, forcing lawmakers to go back to the drawing board in a year’s time.
“We’ll be back here in 2017,” Mica said. “I guaran-damn-tee it.”
http://www.defenseone.com/management/2016/02/obamas-security-clearance-overhaul-lands-thud-lawmakers/126257/
