People can say that online polls are not scientific, but the article does say that they are good for judging "enthusiasm" for a candidate. Obviously, the "enthusiasm" is running heavily for Donald Trump - just like those old polls that showed "enthusiasm" for Ron Paul.
The difference between those two is that Ron Paul wasn't winning primaries like Trump is. Ron Paul's "enthusiasm" was a mile wide and an inch deep. Donald Trump's "enthusiasm" appears to be a mile wide and a
mile deep.
If we're going to poo-poo online polls because they are not a scientific measurement - only showing "enthusiasm" levels....what does that say for the "enthusiasm" levels for the
other candidates? Not much, from the looks of it.
I've only watched the first half of the debate so far - but from what I've watched - Donald Trump is the resounding winner! I love the graphic of the little dog nipping at someone's heels - except what I've seen so far - there were TWO little dogs nipping at Trump's heels!
Also, as noted above - Trump leads in most states in
scientific polls as well.