Now you're just speaking nonsense, ML. Pure nonsense.
Not if you have even a modicum of objectivity.
From your responses here, you are trying to prove that what he said was not what he meant, and that people who see what he said and interpret his words rationally based on the preponderance of the evidence in what he has already said, are 'speaking nonsense.'
Why do you doubt that he said what he meant? Again........ do you assume he is a liar, or just inarticulate?