Author Topic: Wisconsin Tyranny – Leftists Use Force to Silence Political Opponents Like Scott Walker  (Read 865 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Wisconsin Tyranny – Leftists Use Force to Silence Political Opponents Like Scott Walker

by Sara Noble • April 21, 2015   


John Doe laws dating back to the 19th century in Wisconsin allow DAs to hold secret panels, compel people to give testimony and turn over documents. To take advantage of the loopholes was Prosecutor John Chisholm, a partisan hack who had a vendetta against Scott Walker.

The corruption extends to judges, police officers, lawyers and to at least one newspaper, the Journal Sentinel.

In a September 9, 2014 article, former Milwaukee police officer Michael Lutz, who for several months served as an unpaid special prosecutor in Chisholm’s office, said that Milwaukee County DA John Chisholm, a Democrat, told him in March 2011 about his contempt for Walker.

“He felt it was his personal duty to stop people from being treated like this, to stop Walker from treating people like this,” Lutz told Wisconsin Reporter. It wasn’t only Walker who suffered under the partisan left’s malice, it was anyone surrounding Walker.

Lutz (photo below), who is a retired disabled police officer, went to law school and had been friends with the Chisholms, even giving to Chisholm’s campaign, but he couldn’t live with the way they were going after opponents. He has paid dearly for telling the truth.

 
Dan Bice (photo below) of the Journal Sentinel went after Lutz, smearing him and falsely accusing him of issuing “death threats,” destroying his reputation and his credibility.

 

Lutz says his law practice has been ruined because he has been blacklisted. No other attorneys will speak out against Chisholm and his corrupt crew because they too will lose their practices.

The prosecutor, John Chisholm (photo below), is described as “hyper-partisan” in a “hyper-partisan” district, and used the John Doe process against Scott Walker, depriving him and anyone associated with him of their constitutional rights, as Walker began his rise to power and became a potential candidate for governor.

Chisholm

Chisholm’s wife is a teachers’-union shop steward who was distraught over Act 10’s union reforms. She is alleged by Lutz to have spurred Chisholm on as it was his “personal duty to stop him.” When the attempts at stopping the union reforms failed, Chisholm found other fertile ground and a very cooperative Judge Barbara Kluka.

Wisconsin has been using John Doe laws in lieu of the grand jury process since the early 19th century. It gives the prosecutor additional powers, powers that can be used to deprive people of constitutional protections and attack political opponents.

In Wisconsin, the law allows a prosecutor to go to a judge with a “suspicion” and the judge can sign off and let the prosecutor bring in witnesses they can force to testify in secrecy. Federal grand juries operate all the time in Wisconsin but they have rules about secrecy and timelines that John Doe laws do not have.

In the hands of the corrupt prosecutor, there are no First Amendment rights. There is no due process.

National Review attorney David French has been investigating the use of these laws and what he found should terrify people. Political opponents have been subject to SWAT teams and other law enforcement coming to their homes with battering rams and guns drawn. The teams have torn apart homes and never once gave the victim the benefit of their constitutional rights.

Innocent people with the “wrong” political views were subjected to the same treatment drug dealers receive. Then they were warned not to tell anyone, not even family and to not call a lawyer. It kept the communist-like tyranny a secret from the general public.

Supporters of Governor Walker who were newbies to the political process became the subjects of “multi-year secretive criminal investigations, slanderous and selective leaks to sympathetic media, and intrusive electronic snooping.”

It’s not unlike the IRS targeting.

The Progressives in Wisconsin weaponized law enforcement against their political opponents. It was full-blown tyranny.

Lawsuits followed. The entire affair is one of corruption, deceit, misuse of public office and it is thanks to these lawsuits and people like David French and Michael Lutz that the truth be known. Everyone needs to read the French exposé which can be found on this link.

The law was used as it was never intended to expand investigations of a particular case into people in the Walker administration and Walker himself, all of whom had nothing to do with the original case. That is a tactic used by the Obama administration against political opponents and even the AP.

Sheriff Clarke spoke out courageously last year.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/wisconsin-tyranny-leftists-use-force-to-silence-political-opponents-like-scott-walker/
« Last Edit: April 22, 2015, 09:29:06 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
"Laws dating back to 19th century" can be changed with legislature and Gov. office in Republicans' hands, which have been the case since 2011.

So why not an article begging the question as to why this allegedly awful abuse has not been corrected?

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,808
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
[[ Wisconsin has been using John Doe laws in lieu of the grand jury process since the early 19th century. It gives the prosecutor additional powers, powers that can be used to deprive people of constitutional protections and attack political opponents. ]]

Well then -- since Walker is the governor, and the state legislature is controlled by Republicans, isn't it about time the state of Wisconsin REPEALED the John Doe laws, and INSTITUTED a grand jury system?

Open call to Scott Walker:
Would you REALLY like to demonstrate before the voters of your state -- and of America -- that you are committed to returning America to a time of good governance when the rights of the citizen were paramount?

Do something about these heinous laws in your own state, sir....

Oceander

  • Guest
[[ Wisconsin has been using John Doe laws in lieu of the grand jury process since the early 19th century. It gives the prosecutor additional powers, powers that can be used to deprive people of constitutional protections and attack political opponents. ]]

Well then -- since Walker is the governor, and the state legislature is controlled by Republicans, isn't it about time the state of Wisconsin REPEALED the John Doe laws, and INSTITUTED a grand jury system?

Open call to Scott Walker:
Would you REALLY like to demonstrate before the voters of your state -- and of America -- that you are committed to returning America to a time of good governance when the rights of the citizen were paramount?

Do something about these heinous laws in your own state, sir....


Agreed.  And rein in (and punish) this DA as well.

Offline ArneFufkin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
[[ Wisconsin has been using John Doe laws in lieu of the grand jury process since the early 19th century. It gives the prosecutor additional powers, powers that can be used to deprive people of constitutional protections and attack political opponents. ]]

Well then -- since Walker is the governor, and the state legislature is controlled by Republicans, isn't it about time the state of Wisconsin REPEALED the John Doe laws, and INSTITUTED a grand jury system?

Open call to Scott Walker:
Would you REALLY like to demonstrate before the voters of your state -- and of America -- that you are committed to returning America to a time of good governance when the rights of the citizen were paramount?

Do something about these heinous laws in your own state, sir....

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is set to rule on three separate lawsuits challenging this corrupt, abusive probe.   If they rule this John Doe  witch hunt is illegal and unfounded (as is expected) the two branches of Wisconsin's GOP majority Legislature will quickly pass legislation severely reforming this abusive and politically corrupted process.  It is expected the Court will rule on this case in July or so.

The Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme court is a thoroughly corrupt 81 year old Democrat battle axe who has been slow-pacing this timeline.   April 3 the voters of Wisconsin changed the Constitution of Wisconsin to permit the Supreme Court justices to choose their Chief (it's now based on tenure and Old Shirley has been there since 1976 and Chief since 1996) and as usual with Wisconsin Leftists she immediately filed a lawsuit challenging the results of that Constitutional referendum.   They are pathetic.

A federal judge refused to vacate the results of the Constitutional Referendum so Old Shirley is likely out and various Democrat/liberal lawsuits to GOP legislation that have failed in lower courts and that she has been blocking and slow-walking will now be heard and decided.   Here is the lovely Shirley Abrahamson: 

https://hereandnow.wbur.org/2015/04/21/wisconsin-supreme-court

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/supreme-court-justices-legal-fight-could-bring-big-cost-to-wisconsin-taxpayers-b99485322z1-300788121.html

Unfortunately, the Milwaukee County DA is an elected official and Milwaukee city and county has been turning from a beautiful lakeside burg to a Detroit-like Democrat run cesspool of crime and corruption.  So I don't know that he would ever be thrown out by the ghetto-grifters and venal liberal operatives there.   
« Last Edit: April 23, 2015, 01:55:21 am by ArneFufkin »

rangerrebew

  • Guest
I can't figure out why this story doesn't seem to be getting much traction in the MSM? :whistle:

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,831
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
I'd RICO their ass in federal court.
The Republic is lost.

Oceander

  • Guest
I'd RICO their ass in federal court.

On what basis?

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,831
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
On what basis?

Because RICO is now applied far broader than it's original intent. Coordinating and conspiring to intimidate and abuse individuals is very close to mafia style behavior, and I imagine a smart team of lawyers could very well make it stick.

At the very least, they could open the door to discovery and bring it all to light, which on it's own is worth something. Might get some scumbags fired, out of office and off the bench.
The Republic is lost.